I don't think you can judge until we have the whole picture, and that takes time. So far he's made moves that appear to be more important for bookkeeping and flexibility than actual basketball fit. On the negative side, you might look at the Richardson acquisition and think, "we added a guy that doesn't fit our two biggest obvious needs and based on what team you talk to, has negative value right now." So it could be they're just acquiring a contract on the books before the Hayward deadline expired so they have more deals on the books for future trades. The follow-up question then becomes, well yeah, but couldn't they have acquired somebody else more useful and still accomplished that purpose (e.g. Satoransky)? Sure, but perhaps the price was too high or the other teams didn't want to take on any of our expendable guaranteed deals for 2021-2022 (Moses Brown, Grant Williams, Carsen Edwards?).
The other potential foreshadowing of these moves is they know they're not going to re-sign Fournier. Regardless of whether you think Fournier is worth that money or the tax payment, the fact is the team on the court would be better with him on the roster as opposed to off, especially if they decide not to use the full mid-level.
There are still moves to make obviously, so I'll give him an incomplete right now. I think it's pretty clear they're preparing for next year's free agency. Kemba and Tristan's deals are still haunting us in the form of Horford and other assorted guaranteed deals, but at least they made those burdens slightly less onerous.