This whole "he shouldn't be trapped in a situation he didn't choose" is garbage and the ultimate gaslighting.
Who is arguing that?
This is a quote from this thread:
I prefer players to have control in their decisions rather than just stay loyal to a team that is not only incompetent but doesn't respect them.
Durant is in a situation of his own creation. Acting like he's just some guy who this all happened to is disingenuous.
Well, that quote was from a discussion of Giannis, as compared to players like Lebron, Durant, Kawhi and others. I don't think Rondo9 ever specifically said that Durant didn't contribute to his situation, or that it's cool to demand a trade with four years left.
As for my own perspective, I think that players should be held to their contracts. If they want to bolt as free agents, fine, but the idea that they'll sign a max extension and then force their way out a year later is ridiculous. Teams should be able to sue for breach of contract, including related damages.
But, I think the "Durant is a malcontent, and he'd blow things up on the Celtics" argument (or some variation thereof) is lazy and leaves out relevant data points. Yes, Brooklyn went horribly last season, after Kyrie went full crazy and refused to play games. But, the prior season the Nets were title favorites, and almost made it by the Bucks. That's despite a first year coach and a team that was almost 100% turned over. And, in Golden State, he fit in seamlessly for awhile, before clashing with Draymond his final year there. In a world without vaccine mandates, for all we know the Nets are celebrating a title right now.
For any team trading for Durant, I expect him to play well and to focus on winning. If he's added to a stable, talented, well-run franchise, I expect deep playoff runs, assuming health.