Author Topic: Deepest bench in years?  (Read 8118 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #15 on: July 23, 2015, 02:42:45 PM »

Offline celts55

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2602
  • Tommy Points: 574
It's great that our bench is as deep as it is. It's a shame we don't have any starters.

I think I disagree. We have a few guys that could start on a championship team. Only problem is they would be 4th-5th best starter.

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #16 on: July 23, 2015, 03:00:53 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33650
  • Tommy Points: 1549
It's great that our bench is as deep as it is. It's a shame we don't have any starters.

I think I disagree. We have a few guys that could start on a championship team. Only problem is they would be 4th-5th best starter.
Mario Chalmers started on a team that went to 4 straight NBA Finals, winning two of them.  Pretty much any player can start on a title team. 

The real key to your statement is we don't have a foundational piece in place and that is the problem.
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #17 on: July 23, 2015, 04:26:17 PM »

Offline TA9

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2712
  • Tommy Points: 118
  • I Bleed Green
It's great that our bench is as deep as it is. It's a shame we don't have any starters.

I think I disagree. We have a few guys that could start on a championship team. Only problem is they would be 4th-5th best starter.
Mario Chalmers started on a team that went to 4 straight NBA Finals, winning two of them.  Pretty much any player can start on a title team
This! Even Rondo (who was very unproven at that time) started on our championship team back in the 07-08 season even though many people regarded him as a bench player ::)
Jack of all trades, master of none.

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #18 on: July 23, 2015, 04:39:56 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136
Rondooooooooo!

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #19 on: July 23, 2015, 04:45:35 PM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
Another spectacular food fight about our roster  ;D

Bring it on!


Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #20 on: July 23, 2015, 04:58:58 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36890
  • Tommy Points: 2969

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #21 on: July 23, 2015, 05:15:05 PM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
Rondooooooooo!


Who?

Chocolate biscuits? What do chocolate biscuits have to do with our bench?


Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #22 on: July 23, 2015, 05:22:46 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
One good thought experiment to sort the Mario Chalmers from the Chris Boshes on any given roster is to look at the nominal starting five and sub them out, one at a time, for LeBron James (or an equivalent franchise-altering superstar if you don't want to envision James on the Celtics).

So, looking at our nominal depth chart at ESPN:
espn.go.com/nba/team/depth/_/name/bos/boston-celtics

We're starting
Zeller
Johnson
Turner
Bradley
Smart

(the Lee trade isn't there yet)

How much better would our team be if it was
James
Johnson
Turner
Bradley
Smart

or

Zeller
James
Turner
Bradley
Smart

or

Zeller
Johnson
James
Bradley
Smart

Not appropriating for position, just a sheer upgrade in talent -- and you can see which players are, relatively speaking, more or less important than the others, at least in terms of being better for the squad on an individual talent level than their contemporaries by virtue of their hypothetical, vacuumed replacement.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #23 on: July 23, 2015, 05:25:02 PM »

Offline LGC88

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1500
  • Tommy Points: 167

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #24 on: July 23, 2015, 05:45:05 PM »

Offline Clench123

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3055
  • Tommy Points: 251
Deepest bench! Our whole roster is a deep bench team.
Hahahaha
Our best player just averaged 8.2mpg while racking up 8 DNP's during a championship run... you hear that, notbill?... a CHAMPIONSHIP run.   Banner #17 here we come.

You don't deserve to be a snob when you can't even get the title number right.

I always said when I left the Celtics, I could not go to heaven, because that would
 be a step down. I am pure 100 percent Celtic. I think if you slashed my wrists, my
 blood would’ve been green.  -  Bill "Greatest of All Time" Russell

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #25 on: July 23, 2015, 05:56:15 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7510
  • Tommy Points: 743
It's great that our bench is as deep as it is. It's a shame we don't have any starters.

I think I disagree. We have a few guys that could start on a championship team. Only problem is they would be 4th-5th best starter.
Mario Chalmers started on a team that went to 4 straight NBA Finals, winning two of them.  Pretty much any player can start on a title team
This! Even Rondo (who was very unproven at that time) started on our championship team back in the 07-08 season even though many people regarded him as a bench player ::)
Yes, I'm being facetious. But you get what I'm saying.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #26 on: July 23, 2015, 06:01:11 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6974
  • Tommy Points: 466
Obviously people have no idea what depth is.  This team is not deep.

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #27 on: July 23, 2015, 06:15:24 PM »

Offline tarheelsxxiii

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8593
  • Tommy Points: 1389
One good thought experiment to sort the Mario Chalmers from the Chris Boshes on any given roster is to look at the nominal starting five and sub them out, one at a time, for LeBron James (or an equivalent franchise-altering superstar if you don't want to envision James on the Celtics).

So, looking at our nominal depth chart at ESPN:
espn.go.com/nba/team/depth/_/name/bos/boston-celtics

We're starting
Zeller
Johnson
Turner
Bradley
Smart

(the Lee trade isn't there yet)

How much better would our team be if it was
James
Johnson
Turner
Bradley
Smart

or

Zeller
James
Turner
Bradley
Smart

or

Zeller
Johnson
James
Bradley
Smart

Not appropriating for position, just a sheer upgrade in talent -- and you can see which players are, relatively speaking, more or less important than the others, at least in terms of being better for the squad on an individual talent level than their contemporaries by virtue of their hypothetical, vacuumed replacement.

Poor Turner.

Related to the bold, I am completely unconvinced that you are not a psychologist. :)
The Tarstradamus Group, LLC

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #28 on: July 23, 2015, 06:18:11 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
What do you guys think?

say starting lineup is

Amir
Lee
Turner
AB
Smart

Bench depth

Zeller/KO
Sully/Jerebko/Mickey
Crowder/PJ3
Hunter/Young
IT/Rozier

*one player (likely pf) cut from lineup

out of 10, how would you rate this bench?
The bench is a ten. The starters are a 4

Re: Deepest bench in years?
« Reply #29 on: July 23, 2015, 08:36:00 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
Play fast, share the ball, and defend aggressively. Run every chance you can, substitute often. When you have a team without standout players, and a deep bench. Push the pace.