What's not really talked about is the NBA is much more of a 3 point shooting league than it was when RR was in his prime. Take away one 'small' who can hit the 3 these days and your team is at a disadvantage. So I think that when people say the market for Rondo has diminished, it really is true. He needs to find the right situation,
I agree with this analysis. Ainge, in his own way, agrees also.
Thomas is the point guard that Ainge "wanted."
Rondo was the point guard Ainge traded.
I do not suggest the two players contracts, deals, situations are equals. I suggest, in line with the post quoted here, that Thomas is more the "contemporary point guard" with a relatively effective three pointer and distinctly more aggressive drive to the hoop followed by above average FT shooting. (Jury is still out on Thomas' "complete game." I hope but, am unsure as to whether the Steven's system is perfect for Thomas. I am elated with the offense, I don't know about the rest of the players on the court with him, it is too early.)
Ainge knows what he wants, but, all GM's are driven by changes in the game and three point shooting has driven the stat mavens to the point of having a head coach tell Jared Sullinger to tee up 381 three pt attempts in his last 125 games. (he hit 27.7% of them)
Rondo is a brilliant passer/tactician who doesn't have the 3 pt shooting/scoring chops NBA teams are designing into the PG position.
It would be interesting to know some background with Mark Cuban,his coach and GM. I like Rick Carlisle, but, it is neither his fault or Rondo's if an owner and GM "put the deal on him" without his full participation.
Maybe Carlisle never wanted this player as he knew well, Rondo was not a "fit" and they are stuck with each other?
Drama.