Author Topic: Role of BCS in conference instability  (Read 2975 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Role of BCS in conference instability
« on: October 10, 2011, 10:31:57 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
I'm curious if any college football experts on here can provide some info on whether or not the BCS thingie in football is a major contributor to the level of upheaval in conferences. I know schools are concerned with the automatic bids that the largest conferences get, but I don't get all the mechanics.

It does seem that all movement is due to football with no thought about other sports involved.

Re: Role of BCS in conference instability
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2011, 06:32:20 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33661
  • Tommy Points: 1549
Football yes, BCS not so much.
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Role of BCS in conference instability
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2011, 08:33:53 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Seems to me that the BCS is a big problem.

My understanding of the movement is that teams are trying to make sure they are in conferences that will gain automatic BCS bids (whatever that means). I don't think having a "true" champion is that important -- or at least not as important as having more stability and reducing travel for students whose conferences no longer make any geographical sense.

If we get rid of the BCS and automatic bids, would conferences really mean that much? The only reason the Big East is panicing is because they are worried about losing their automatic bid.

Re: Role of BCS in conference instability
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2011, 08:51:59 PM »

Offline Mike-Dub

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3578
  • Tommy Points: 28
Honestly I don't believe ANY of this conference realignment would have happened if the BCS wasn't around. 

THE BCS HAS TO GO!!!
"It's all about having the heart of a champion." - #34 Paul Pierce

Re: Role of BCS in conference instability
« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2011, 10:32:46 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33661
  • Tommy Points: 1549
Seems to me that the BCS is a big problem.

My understanding of the movement is that teams are trying to make sure they are in conferences that will gain automatic BCS bids (whatever that means). I don't think having a "true" champion is that important -- or at least not as important as having more stability and reducing travel for students whose conferences no longer make any geographical sense.

If we get rid of the BCS and automatic bids, would conferences really mean that much? The only reason the Big East is panicing is because they are worried about losing their automatic bid.
the Big East has 6 football schools.  If it doesn't add schools it will cease to exist as a football conference.  It is possible that some of the schools being looked at are BCS AQ related (like Boise), but Boise is only getting a football invitation and not a full invitation.
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Role of BCS in conference instability
« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2011, 12:22:09 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31111
  • Tommy Points: 1619
  • What a Pub Should Be
Speaking of the BCS, the first rankings come out tonight.

Should be interesting when the season ends and there are 4 undefeated teams.  Ugh... 


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team