I'm looking for you to explain what you mean when you say "legitimate". It really isn't a complicated question.
I am looking for you to explain why you need me to do that. I want to know your intentions which you never made clear. It's not that complicated a question.
You could have just said you're not interested in this conversation and you would have saved both of us some bandwidth.
Then you shouldn't have said anything in the first place. Please tell me how the website isn't 'legitimate.'
I've got no idea what a "legitimate website" is, so I'm afraid I can't answer your question. Let's not go through that again.
Larbrd called it a tabloid (i.e. not legitimate). I called it legitimate. It's not that complicated to understand what was being said.
Yet you do realize that tabloids have "real" reporters that spew garbage and illegitimate nonsense 95% of the time, but get some things correct, right?
The National Enquirer is a tabloid. They have published many magazines with Bigfoot and alien stories on the cover page. But they also broke some stories that looked like B.S. that turned out to be true (Tiger Woods.) Just because they have actual reporters with credentials and sources, and just because they occasionally get a story right, doesn't mean they are legitimate.
Legitimate reporters on the Cs are the ones we follow with connects within the team. Like Bulpett. He said the Griffin talks have never happened. So RealGm is indeed illegitimate for saying that this was coming.
Actually, Bigfoot is real. If u dig n do your research u will find that an x police officer and human resources coordinator David Paulides has spent 2 years on the hoppi reservation doing DNA research. They r not apes but rather a human hybred tribal species who actually have their own language. Aliens I think r real to but I'd have to dig n research that more.
Regardless of the convincing evidence produced by my Wikipedia search I won't be convinced until we capture one of these half-Hoppi hybred beast men for study.
Obviously Aliens will be harder to capture, but where there's a will there's a way.
Regarding the existence of other intelligent life in the universe, I think a convincing logical argument has been made based on probabilities and the vastness of space.
I think the argument goes something like this:
- In the observable universe, there are billions upon billions of other galaxies, with many more estimated outside of our current observable universe.
- Each of those galaxies contains billions upon billions of stars.
- It's estimated that at least one star in each Galaxy has a planet in the habitable zone that is capable of sustaining complex life.
- Thus, given the success rate of developing complex life on a habitable planet (whatever that rate is), there's a high probability of complex, intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.
Of course, that intelligent life could be so far away that we'd never be able to have contact with them, but they'd exist nonetheless. As far as intelligent life goes, I think that you're completely justified to believe that probability dictates that there's at least one other intelligent civilization out there. I think it's highly naive to think there's not at least complex life elsewhere in the universe, and it's downright illogical to think that there's no life in any way, shape, or form elsewhere in the universe.
Topic: Sporting News: C's targeting Griffin, will make major deal soon (Read 109745 times)