i watched firefly and serenity on dvd. i liked 'em. i especailly liked the offing of a couple of characters i thought were very bad on the show. i think it would have been a much better show without one particular character.
Hahaha. Yes, they most definitely should have gotten rid of that ONE character long ago! Roddenberry would have NEVER included such an irrelevant character in the first place.
And the show should not have been called Firefly - that's just weak.
Which character bugged you?
what does roddenberry have to do with this? this wasen't his kind of show at all anyway, he prefered hero centric space dramas. He would not have approved of weldon casting essentialy the anti-hero's as main characters.
If gene had made it, it would be about a clear "white hat" crew going against the ally's on principle, not a moraly ambiguous crew shafting the allaince when convenant because of thier captain and robbing and murdering for money on the side.
for character, I'm going to guess wash, although i liked the comic relief he provided as the pilot.
Also, the show should have been called firefly. that was the name of the class of ship. it was a fine name.
it's problem was it was on fox, who often kills good shows for no reason.
i mean, if you know the history of the show, they doomed it from the start. Its a show that, like most shows, relies on showing its episodes in order.
Fox took a diffrent route, and started with episode 4, then went back to 2, then jumped forward to 8.
They also moved its timeslot 5 times in the first 7 weeks.
if that show had been on sci fi, it would have been wonderful and had a great run. its crime was not drawing a ton of buffy fans like fox thought it would. Its the same reason they axed futrama and family guy during the same period for not drawing like the simpsons (how'd that work out in hindsight, eh fox?)