If it is a guard who clearly is the best player available when the Celtics pick, how many posters here will insist the Celtics should still draft for need and take a big?
I think the Cs should always draft BPA.
However I also feel that drafting a 2/3 (like Shabazz or GRIII) can also fill a need. The current talent, style and sizes of the guards on the Cs roster do not lend themselves to an easy rotation. Rondo, AB, and Terry all have PG size. Lee and Crawford have SG size and only T Will has the size to really be a 2/3. In terms of skill set Rondo and T Will are PGs, AB and Lee defensive based players, Crawford and Terry scorers.
I hope that the upcoming off-season Danny is able to consolidate some of the Guard talent. My best case would be the addition of a scoring 2/3 to take the place of Lee and Terry. Making the rotation
PG Rondo 35min, Avery 13min
SG Avery 17min, new 2/3 15min, crawford 16min
SF Paul 25min, Green 15min, 2/3 8min
PF Sully 20min, Green 17min, Bass 11min
C Kevin 25min, Sully 10, Randolph 13min