Kanter is OK as a starter because Hayward will be coming off the bench.
It makes much more sense to place a couple high high energy defensive wing players into a lineup that features both Kemba and Kanter. And it makes too much sense having a vet who can do a bit of everything well running with a bench team that is young/inexperienced.
Kemba/Edwards
Smart/Langford
Brown/Hayward
Tatum/Williams
Kanter/Porier or Rob
No chance Hayward comes off the bench assuming he is healthy. I think they start the season with Kemba/Brown/Tatum/Hayward/Kanter and see where it goes. My hope is that Timelord makes massive strides. Ideally he’d be the best fit in a vacuum but that’s a lot to expect out of him for a year 1 to 2 jump. Ultimately, I think they’ll package a couple of players for a decent big during the course of the season.
Silky is a Hayward troll, just ignore him when he does that.
Why name call?
Instead debate against my points with opposing ones or just ignore.
I mean its hard to argue against my points, of which i believe can maximize haywards impact, with the opposite when the opposite has no leg to stand on.
Hayward, if 100 percent, is IMHO arguably the best player on the team and certainly one of the top two. I wouldn't blame those who put Kemba as number one, but Gordon at his best was a special player. The only question will be if he is at or close to 100 percent. If he is close to his best, then he starts no question. If he's less than that, then he could certainly come off the bench. But if he is scoring 20 plus ppg on efficient shooting, passing well, and in general doing all the things he can do, it is clearly the best choice to start him. The Celtics won't, I think, have a true second unit where all the starters are on the bench for extended periods, they will simply stagger the rotation so a starter is almost always on the floor. In that situation there is really no advantage to having one of your two best players start on the bench.