never said they were going to sign Dwight, just pointing out that Detroit has a more enticing group of young players than the Celtics do.
Detroit isn't signing anyone. You said they would be 'more enticing' because of their young players. It's not. They only have the MLE to spend, which I doubt they are using. Detroit is an absolute mess of a city right now, that team is losing money, they have something pathetic like a 55% attendance capacity right now. And only like 40% even show up for games. That's historically bad. That's 2002 Charlotte Hornets territory when their fans were boycotting the team. They are of no factor in free agency, despite who they have on their team.
I'd say for the next couple of seasons the Pistons will likely be better than the Celtics.
We'll see. People said the same thing about the Lakers 2005-2007. They had a team that looked like they were locked into a forever-7 seed. Then they got lucky. These trademark NBA franchises like the Celtics, Lakers, and Knicks will always find their way to be competitive. Only way it doesn't happen is if you have a complete moron as GM (ML Carr, Isiah Thomas.) Only the Bulls took the 'tank' rout. And many people will point out - look how it worked out for them, they got Rose! Yeah, after throwing away an entire decade.