nice topic...
Regarding KG, I have yet to understand why the word decline has been attached to his name....To me, anyone talking about KG's "decline" is basically someone who doesn't believe that his knee was all that screwed up. Either that, or they've never played sports and think that knees are only mildly important.
People talk about all the miles KG has put in in supporting their decline diagnosis....but we're talking about KG, one of the biggest energizer bunnies to ever grace a court. He was going along fine and the knee took him out, at which point he started to REST far more than he ever has or has wanted.......Does an energizer bunny who takes a good long rest suddenly turn into an old fart because he's 34 and not 33?
With KG, it's all about the knee.
Of course, injuries are more likely at a later age, and I am a believer in age-appropriate minutes, and taking a night off here and there. But that's not reflective of decline either. That's just common sense.... I also believe a GM can say, okay, he's playing fine but he's 34, so I'm trading him. That's also not decline, but common sense (depending on immediate goals of that team).
I've worried about possible decline with Paul because he's spoken about being tired, and looked tired on many occasions, but his recent play is suggesting Paul's issue is also more about overcoming injury than big bad, ugly decline....
Let's separate injuries from decline, guys. Is Greg Oden in decline? We may, in fact, not get a chance to judge whether KG declines due this knee thing (looking good knock on wood). Injury prevents sound analysis of an issue like decline.
KG just isn't the tired type. And imo something like 70 percent of decline is tired....
Back to the thread, intelligence regarding their bodies could definitely extend the window of the big 3 via reducing injuries and staying un-tired.