yeah, defense is what won the game. people are making alot of celtics shooting 41%. but Miami shot 39.1% from 3! and 51% total for the game. its very simplistic to say "celtics shot well so they won"
But it was the ball pressure and being physical with their hands, forcing turnovers, fighting hard for 50-50 balls. Miami had to work for EVERYTHING. They made bam/jimmy uncomfortable...most of the shots Miami hit were tough "got to tip your cap" type shots.
compare that to games 1-3 where celtics let Miami shoot like 60% and get to anywhere they wanted on the court.
IF, and thats a big if considering how this team has played at times they can keep that defensive intensity up. Miami cant beat them. Chuck is right on that one. he said if celtics play to their potential, Miami cant win.
I think we need a tatum masterclass type game where he goes for 46. Although I'll take another Derrick White big game...
The point I was making is that making your shots, especially threes, make defending an easier job. The other team has to inbound the ball and walk it up the court against a set defense. It's easier to force turnovers and steals against a half court offense than one that is in transition. When you miss threes it increases the chance for a transition opportunity on the other end, especially if there's nobody back, teams can easily leak out against a scrambling defense. Plus you're just more energized when you make shots.
I'm not suggesting that they just "won because of threes" though that definitely helped. It's a cascading effect - make your threes, other team has to walk it up, easier to defend. What I'd like to see from them is the same level of commitment on defense, whether it's preventing teams getting out in transition after misses or defending in the half court. We have a 40-2 record in 100 games (regular season and playoffs) when we shoot over 40% and a 29-31 record when we shoot less than 40%. A big part of that is letting their heads drop after misses but it's also because it's harder to defend when teams rebound the ball after misses and push the ball up vs when they are taking the ball out of the basket and inbounding it and walking it up against a set defense.
NBA.com doesn't track these stats (to the best of my knowledge) but I'd be curious to know what % of possessions we defended that were transition/breakout type possessions vs half court possession in Games 1-3 vs Games 4-5 and how well we defended each. But if defense is truly going to be their calling card, they need to maintain the intensity when the ball isn't going in, make sure they run back, don't get beat by their man up the court, don't complain to the ref after a miss because you think you got fouled and let the other team beat you up the court. Those are the little details that I think will help their defense and help them win even if they shoot 20% from 3.
It's not easy though, letting missed shots lead to lackadaisical defense happens to the best of them it seems

“The last two games are not who we are,” Butler insisted. “It just happened be that way. We stopped playing defense, halfway because we didn’t make shots we want to make. That’s easily correctable. We’ve got to come out and play harder from the jump.”
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/05/26/sports/celtics-still-trail-this-series-all-pressure-is-heat/
You can bet Spoel will make sure that doesn't happen again, Joe has to make sure we do the same.
On another note, I'm stoked to see all the positivity from everyone - the site is so much more pleasant to be at when they're winning and playing well, no doubt...hope we have a few more believers after the last couple of games
