Author Topic: Woj: Jrue to Celtics  (Read 58553 times)

tazzmaniac, DefenseWinsChamps and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Woj: Jrue to Celtics
« Reply #450 on: Today at 12:46:07 AM »

Offline keevsnick

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5697
  • Tommy Points: 562
Another excellent game by Jrue.

Yeah, who knew White was going to fall off a cliff? We've really needed Jrue's steady hand these past couple of games. Dude decided to step up at exactly the right time.
Didn't everyone know White was going to fall off a cliff? I mean White was always going to regress to the mean.  That is how those things work.

There’s a space between clear All-Star and 2022 playoffs disaster. We thought he had moved past the latter. Hopefully it really is just a mini-slump and not indicative of something greater. We are who we are this season in large part to White elevating his game.

But luckily Jrue suddenly became a much better player just as White fell off. That has been huge. If both of them just ‘regress to the mean’, then we will be fine, as well
well when you play well above your level, you are invariably going to play well below it at some point, so that you end up where you should be

No, that isn't how probabilities or regression to the mean work. There isn't some cosmic force that will make you play the perfect level of bad to instantly balance out the good, it's far, far more likely to have a bunch slightly below average games than a couple of real stinkers.

But even that isn't guaranteed, players have (and will continue to) go on unreasonably long hot streaks without suddenly having equally long/extreme cold streaks. And ditto for cold streaks like Al's not meaning that he's going to start shooting 57% on threes in the next 2 rounds.

Sure, they don't HAVE TO have unreasonably cold streaks after a hot streak. But they sometimes will. Shooting game to game is basically a normal distribution around your true average. most games you'll be relatively close to your average but for stretches you'll be crazy good or crazy bad, the tails of the distribution.

Following a crazy outlier shooting stretch one direction with a crazy outlier shooting stretch the other will happen sometimes. This is one of those times.

Re: Woj: Jrue to Celtics
« Reply #451 on: Today at 08:32:27 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11527
  • Tommy Points: 886
When I say "regression to the mean" I am probably not using it in the formal statistical manner.  It is more general than that.  You just need to watch the player play.  We have all watched White play for about 2.5 seasons plus playoffs.  We all know he is not going to continue to shoot like that.  He has shot about 38%-40% from 3 over the last two seasons.  Of course he is not going to continue to light it up.

That doesn't necessarily mean he will have a bad stretch but to average say 39% from 3 means that you have stretches that are better and an equal amount that are worse.  That is just how an average or a mean works.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:01:49 AM by Vermont Green »

Re: Woj: Jrue to Celtics
« Reply #452 on: Today at 02:43:26 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33775
  • Tommy Points: 1558
Another excellent game by Jrue.

Yeah, who knew White was going to fall off a cliff? We've really needed Jrue's steady hand these past couple of games. Dude decided to step up at exactly the right time.
Didn't everyone know White was going to fall off a cliff? I mean White was always going to regress to the mean.  That is how those things work.

There’s a space between clear All-Star and 2022 playoffs disaster. We thought he had moved past the latter. Hopefully it really is just a mini-slump and not indicative of something greater. We are who we are this season in large part to White elevating his game.

But luckily Jrue suddenly became a much better player just as White fell off. That has been huge. If both of them just ‘regress to the mean’, then we will be fine, as well
well when you play well above your level, you are invariably going to play well below it at some point, so that you end up where you should be

No, that isn't how probabilities or regression to the mean work. There isn't some cosmic force that will make you play the perfect level of bad to instantly balance out the good, it's far, far more likely to have a bunch slightly below average games than a couple of real stinkers.

But even that isn't guaranteed, players have (and will continue to) go on unreasonably long hot streaks without suddenly having equally long/extreme cold streaks. And ditto for cold streaks like Al's not meaning that he's going to start shooting 57% on threes in the next 2 rounds.

Sure, they don't HAVE TO have unreasonably cold streaks after a hot streak. But they sometimes will. Shooting game to game is basically a normal distribution around your true average. most games you'll be relatively close to your average but for stretches you'll be crazy good or crazy bad, the tails of the distribution.

Following a crazy outlier shooting stretch one direction with a crazy outlier shooting stretch the other will happen sometimes. This is one of those times.
I'm not even sure that is true. Take Curry in his best 3 point shooting season. He shot 45.4%, but here are the number of games and the percentage he shotnin them

60% or better - 11 games
> 50% to 60% - 10 games
Exactly 50% - 13 games
> 45.4 to 50%  - 5 games
40-45.4% - 14 games
30-39.9% - 13 games
< 30% - 11 games

In other words, the greatest shooter ever in his best season was all over the map.  And basically had as many downright terrible games as he did amazingly awesome games.

2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Woj: Jrue to Celtics
« Reply #453 on: Today at 03:50:35 PM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11527
  • Tommy Points: 886

I'm not even sure that is true. Take Curry in his best 3 point shooting season. He shot 45.4%, but here are the number of games and the percentage he shot in them

60% or better - 11 games
> 50% to 60% - 10 games
Exactly 50% - 13 games
> 45.4 to 50%  - 5 games
40-45.4% - 14 games
30-39.9% - 13 games
< 30% - 11 games

In other words, the greatest shooter ever in his best season was all over the map.  And basically had as many downright terrible games as he did amazingly awesome games.

So pretty much a classic bell curve if you include the "exactly 50% in with the 45.4%-50%.  Not sure how you decided on the bands, but if you look at 40% to 50%, that is 22 games.  Then it tails off from there in both directions.  There is nothing surprising here.

White had a few ridiculously hot games.  He isn't going to keep that up for long.  Holiday had a few very flat games.  That isn't going to last either.  It is kind of like saying "you are what your record says your are".  If you have shot 39% over two full seasons, that is what you are.  Unless age or injury or somehting causes a step change.

Re: Woj: Jrue to Celtics
« Reply #454 on: Today at 04:12:47 PM »

Offline keevsnick

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5697
  • Tommy Points: 562
Another excellent game by Jrue.

Yeah, who knew White was going to fall off a cliff? We've really needed Jrue's steady hand these past couple of games. Dude decided to step up at exactly the right time.
Didn't everyone know White was going to fall off a cliff? I mean White was always going to regress to the mean.  That is how those things work.

There’s a space between clear All-Star and 2022 playoffs disaster. We thought he had moved past the latter. Hopefully it really is just a mini-slump and not indicative of something greater. We are who we are this season in large part to White elevating his game.

But luckily Jrue suddenly became a much better player just as White fell off. That has been huge. If both of them just ‘regress to the mean’, then we will be fine, as well
well when you play well above your level, you are invariably going to play well below it at some point, so that you end up where you should be

No, that isn't how probabilities or regression to the mean work. There isn't some cosmic force that will make you play the perfect level of bad to instantly balance out the good, it's far, far more likely to have a bunch slightly below average games than a couple of real stinkers.

But even that isn't guaranteed, players have (and will continue to) go on unreasonably long hot streaks without suddenly having equally long/extreme cold streaks. And ditto for cold streaks like Al's not meaning that he's going to start shooting 57% on threes in the next 2 rounds.

Sure, they don't HAVE TO have unreasonably cold streaks after a hot streak. But they sometimes will. Shooting game to game is basically a normal distribution around your true average. most games you'll be relatively close to your average but for stretches you'll be crazy good or crazy bad, the tails of the distribution.

Following a crazy outlier shooting stretch one direction with a crazy outlier shooting stretch the other will happen sometimes. This is one of those times.
I'm not even sure that is true. Take Curry in his best 3 point shooting season. He shot 45.4%, but here are the number of games and the percentage he shotnin them

60% or better - 11 games
> 50% to 60% - 10 games
Exactly 50% - 13 games
> 45.4 to 50%  - 5 games
40-45.4% - 14 games
30-39.9% - 13 games
< 30% - 11 games

In other words, the greatest shooter ever in his best season was all over the map.  And basically had as many downright terrible games as he did amazingly awesome games.

The example you just provided is basically a bell curve. Here's the # of games broken down by 5% intervals:

0-5: 0
5.01-10: 2
10.01-15: 1
15.01-20: 2
20.01-25: 6
25.01-30: 5
30.01-35: 6
35.01-40: 6
40.01-45: 12
45.01-50: 19
50.01-55: 4
55.01-60: 7
60.01-65: 3
65.01-70: 3
70.01-75: 4
75.01-80: 0

The meat of his attempts are around his seaosn of average of 45 +/- 5%, with expanding shoulders out to there shrinking down to very few occurrences at the extremes. IE: A bell curve.

A seaosn full of shooting attempts will always have numbers all over the place, they'll just be more occurrences generally close to a players average.