LeBron is gone, so I don't see the Raptors getting swept by him again this year.
Unless, of course, LeBron and the Raptors make it to the NBA Finals. They would get swept, again.
The Raptors get linked to getting rolled by LeBron, and with good reason, but let's not forget that before they ever met Playoff LeBron they got swept by the lower-seeded Wizards and taken out in a home Game 7 by a lower seeded Nets teams. They've sucked in the playoffs in non-LeBron situations too.
I think Lowry and Kawhi will both be disgruntled all year and that the team will have a pretty good record on talent but will lowkey underachieve in the regular season and implode in the playoffs.
That Nets team was the one with Pierce, Garnett, Williams, Lopez, and Johnson. They coasted through the regular season managing all of the old guys time, but they were all healthy in the playoffs. In other words, that Nets team was a lot better than the Raptors were in the post season. Wizards though was a pretty bad loss (DeRozan actually played alright, Lowry was atrocious though). Since the Wizards loss though, they have only lost to the Cavs in the playoffs, beating Indiana, Miami, Milwaukee, and Washington over the last 3 seasons.
I'm saying their playoff struggles go beyond "can't beat LeBron". He's been the guy that's gotten them lately but somebody's always gotten them. They blew the first round two years in a row, no LeBron needed. It's just an overly narrow framing to tie it all to LeBron. They've been a bad playoff team, probably historically bad for a team with their seeds over a 5 year period.
You know who else lost in the 1st Round 2 years in a row and then has lost the last 2 seasons to the Cavs, our very own Celtics.
Or maybe the Lakers who were losing in the 06 and 07 1st round are a better comparison. They only went on to the next 3 NBA Finals winning 2.
Teams lose in the 1st round all of the time. The Spurs have as many 1st round losses as they do championships in the last 20 years (starting with the 1st title season). The 4 seasons preceding the Mavericks title, they had 3 1st round losses and a 2nd round loss.
This notion that a young team didn't perform great, is just who they are, is quite silly. They were young, but they got better. They just ran into a better team the last 3 years. It happens.
None of these are very good comparisons, because they're conspicuously missing the key element of consistently losing to lower-seeded teams. Dallas is the best comparison, they blew first rounders as a 2 and a 1 but also won from the 6 spot and lost from a 7. They had a deserved reputation as playoff chokers until they actually got it done. Spurs recent losses were as an 8, a 6 and one legit horrible loss as a 1. Celtics as a 7 and 5, Lakers as a 7 and a 7. With the exception of a couple of huge upsets, all of those teams performed about the way their seed said they should.
Toronto on the other hand has taken seeds of 3, 4, 2, 3, and 1, had homecourt in 7 of 9 series, and gone 15-15 in the 1st round, 4-11 in the 2nd, 2-4 in the conference finals, 21-30 overall. They're 1-6 in home Game 1s. They've never won a series in less than 6. They've been swept 3 times in 5 years, including twice with homecourt.
The reason why it's hard to find a good comparison because they're a historically bad playoff team. The reason why they keep running into better playoff teams is because they're a historically bad playoff team. They're just a historically bad playoff team.