It's the human body, not ****. So you consider 'David' ****?
That's a different topic to a point, but I don't see statues of David on ESPN. This isn't art. It's trying to push extremes and filth. That's what Disney does anymore sadly. The human body should be covered, however at the least I shouldn't have to have that pop up in my face without choosing to go see it.
Just because YOU don't think it's art doesn't mean it isn't. You don't get to decide what's art for everyone else. You don't like it? Don't look and shut the heck up. When you have a problem with Disney then perhaps it's time to look at the root causes of your own squeamishness.
By the way, if you want to see filth I'm sure we can direct you to some more entertaining sites.
Right here is exactly the problem. They don't allow me the choice not to look at it. And to say shut the heck up is exactly what's wrong with things these days. You're all for freedom of expression and choice as long as they agree with you. If not then shut the heck up. People's freedom extends to the point that it takes away others freedoms. You can't choose to force your beliefs on others. I'm not trying to say you can't look at this if you choose to. I'm just saying I shouldn't be forced to. So when I go on a sports page I shouldn't be forced to look at naked butts.
No one is forcing you, so stop it. ESPN is running up to your house, holding you down and taping your eyes open shoving it in your face. It comes in the mail, you see A naked butt, you roll it up, toss it out. If you are seeing "Butts", then you are opening it up. Unless the cover has man athletes on it, then yes you see butts, but a few, and not many.
Also there is NO difference between IT's nude photo and the statue of David outside of medium, nothing. When I did my art classes we used nude models to learn about the human body. It's not "soft ****", theres no trusting,grinding or heavy petting. Most of it has hardly any sexual content in it. It's them doing there thing that makes them athletes. You go to an art gallery and see a nude painting of a woman thats fine, but a photo of an athlete covering the major bits, thats soft ****, give me a break.
Wilforck and Gronk did it too, wheres the body shaming with them? This is why woman can't breast feed in public with out having all these cover up contraptions. When I see a woman breast feeding, I look the other way and give get piece.
I do have to say, these photos are great for my art work. All the muscles moving how they should. I can make some nice super hero prints for the up coming shows. Thanks for the heads up on them.