0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: The Walker Wiggle on October 02, 2012, 03:04:30 AMOkay, I'm just calling my own number again and again at this point...A rules change to consider for 2013-14 - replace the TO category - a negative counting stat which is more often than not won by the losing team in any given match up - with the positive AST/TO ratio?Might even more closely approximate player value, which is what I've come to prefer about counting FGM and FTM in addition to PTS.While the rule could conceivably help our team, I'd object to any changing of categories at this point, just because people have spent years crafting their teams to certain expectations. (Well, at least in theory.)
Okay, I'm just calling my own number again and again at this point...A rules change to consider for 2013-14 - replace the TO category - a negative counting stat which is more often than not won by the losing team in any given match up - with the positive AST/TO ratio?Might even more closely approximate player value, which is what I've come to prefer about counting FGM and FTM in addition to PTS.
Quote from: Roy H. on October 02, 2012, 03:57:37 PMQuote from: The Walker Wiggle on October 02, 2012, 03:04:30 AMOkay, I'm just calling my own number again and again at this point...A rules change to consider for 2013-14 - replace the TO category - a negative counting stat which is more often than not won by the losing team in any given match up - with the positive AST/TO ratio?Might even more closely approximate player value, which is what I've come to prefer about counting FGM and FTM in addition to PTS.While the rule could conceivably help our team, I'd object to any changing of categories at this point, just because people have spent years crafting their teams to certain expectations. (Well, at least in theory.)Agree. We can't change things now.
Luke Babbitt for a 1st rounder
Quote from: Roy H. on October 02, 2012, 03:45:16 PMLuke Babbitt for a 1st rounderDid I miss something? I can't find record of this.
nick and I are putting Amare, Deron, and D12 on the block, mostly because we're bored.
Three-team trade scenario posted on ESPN Insider.
And I still say Curry isn't even as good as KG never mind all those other parts, fantasy or not.
That's not the type of deal that should be vetoed, either. It's certainly not worse than Luke Babbitt for a 1st rounder, or some of the other deals we've seen in recent years. At least Delonte is still in the league, contributing.
Quote from: Lucky17 on November 23, 2011, 02:05:32 PMTrade to announce:Naturals trade Delonte WestEdgar trades right to swap 2012 1sts with Naturals (after Naturals exercise/decline right to swap 1sts with Utah Flash)Quote from: Roy H. on November 03, 2011, 05:37:49 PMDelonte is a throw-in; he's not a rotation player anymore, and will probably end up cut. Right now, he's behind Kyle Singler on my roster.I think it's time to discuss replacing Edgar.
Trade to announce:Naturals trade Delonte WestEdgar trades right to swap 2012 1sts with Naturals (after Naturals exercise/decline right to swap 1sts with Utah Flash)
Delonte is a throw-in; he's not a rotation player anymore, and will probably end up cut. Right now, he's behind Kyle Singler on my roster.