I need your opinion

[RockinRyA]

There's a lot of arguments and discussion going on in a local forum here over a collegiate game, and of course everyone will be biased. So I thought I might ask the folks over here for their unbiased views.

First Video-based on the liveshot and replays, was it really goaltending?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUQ1XjihKXo

2nd video- was there supposed to be a foul in this dunk? (slow mo replay @ 0:57)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUHRmPAaivQ

Im not gonna say which side I am from to make it fair.

Thanks in advance.

[blastoidesroidsnoids]

clearly goal tending and Id say no foul on the dunk

[RockinRyA]

thanks. TP for your efforts. I need more feedback hope i get several more posters 

[Change]

1) Goal tending
2) Foul

In the 2nd video commentators at first were speaking a foreign language, and in an instant went 100% English. It blew my mind.

Rondo recently went to Manila

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-E5_eV4CpYU

Philippines got some ballers. It's only a matter of time before we see Filipino in the NBA

[csfansince60s]

Ball looks like at its apex, not on its way down===no goatltending.

I'd call a foul on the dunk. Contact while in tha air looked clear to me.

[RockinRyA]

1) Goal tending
2) Foul

In the 2nd video commentators at first were speaking a foreign language, and in an instant went 100% English. It blew my mind.

Rondo recently went to Manila

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-E5_eV4CpYU

Philippines got some ballers. It's only a matter of time before we see Filipino in the NBA

guy on rondo's left is the one in the dunk video

[Change]

1) Goal tending
2) Foul

In the 2nd video commentators at first were speaking a foreign language, and in an instant went 100% English. It blew my mind.

Rondo recently went to Manila

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-E5_eV4CpYU

Philippines got some ballers. It's only a matter of time before we see Filipino in the NBA

guy on rondo's left is the one in the dunk video

[Neurotic Guy]

clearly goal tending and Id say no foul on the dunk

Exactly what I would written.  But the foul looks more questionabe than the goaltending.  From the angle we see, looks like defender got the arm a fraction after the ball was going down.  Could have been called a foul, but I think an OK no-call. 

[GreenEnvy]

Goaltending.

Foul. Unless that was Wade, then of course no foul.

[RockinRyA]

TPs to each poster.. 

[fitzhickey]

Goaltending and no foul, looked late.

[Ogaju]

I am giving my opinion before I read any of the other opinions. This is actually easy in my opinion

There is a foul on the dunk

The goaltend is more tricky but at the end it is my opinion that it was a goaltend.

[Kiorrik]

Goaltend, foul.

[Roy H.]

I'd say goaltend, and *probably* a foul, but it's hard to tell from that angle.  Also, I don't know how much contact is generally allowed in the game over there, etc.

Both are very close calls, though, especially in real time.  Even if the calls went against your team, I don't think it's evidence of "the refs are out to screw us", like you hear so often on this board.

[jarufu]

Goaltend and no foul.  Too hard to judge really, but Ravena didn't expect the foul call ...