Problem with this stat is that only 5 of those games were against actual good teams (top eight west, top 5 east, ie clearly above .500 teams). In those games we are a robust 4-1, but the fact that most of his good game come against bad teams may simply be an indicator that like all players he plays better against bad teams.
This is a fair point. It would also be interesting to see the actual number of shot attempts he took in those games compared to others since that could certainly be a factor (example: he scores 16 points but does it on like a mediocre 5-15 shooting).
But I also am confident in saying that our recipe for success this postseason will come from more Hayward shots and LESS Rozier + Morris. Rozier and Morris can still contribute and have a great game or two, but I doubt they can be consistent while I do think Hayward has the potential to be given he is given more minutes (even if off the bench).
Part of the issue has been it seems that Hayward will have a great game or two, but then because of injuries or what not the rotations and minutes get moved around a bit and so Hayward can end up not having an impact for that game. Yes, part of that is on Hayward himself, he needs to more assertive and aggressive, but the other part is simply Rozier and Morris playing for contracts. I mean, when they are on the court you often see those two (and Tatum sometimes) take dumb shots while Hayward or Brown are wide open or making a cut inside and they don't make the pass. Infuriating