both are slowly becoming "over the hill" . I mean Melo was done 2 seasons ago
Someone will open up their pocket books for PG13... I think it will be a mistake.
George will be 28 on May 2nd .
Melo is not a superstar. He hasn't been for some time now. He is a Kyle Kuzma like player only with older legs and a self-destructive ego that is struggling to accept his new-found place in the league. Melo could be a fine 4th or 5th best player on a title team (4th best in OKC already) if he learned to accept his new limitations. Without that acceptance, he is a 15-20mpg bench player.
Paul George gets too much of a pass. His defense has fallen way off from where it was before the injuries yet everyone still talks about him as a great two-way player. He is not. He is good playing the passing lanes but is only a middle of the pack one-on-one defender and often gives lackluster effort & focus on team D. On offense, he doesn't attack his defender / the basket enough. He never did but even less since the injuries. Far too reliant on long range (often contested) jump-shots. Doesn't push himself (his talent) hard enough. Settles for good-enough most of the time (on offense, and on defense). George is still an All-Star talent but he is no longer a top 10 player in the league level player.
While I agree with you on Melo as I believe that he needs to embrace the Mark Aguirre for the Bad Boys role moving forward, so to speak, I'm afraid that I have to completely disagree about your views on George.
Granted, he does drive to the basket less since his injury, but you're really underrating the guy, imo. Did you miss the playoff series against Toronto in 2016, which was his first postseason since his horrific injury, wherein he not only averaged 27.3 ppg, but also locked Derozan and was, by far, the best player in that series?
What happened two years ago isn’t totally relevant to what just happened this year. George plays a much more lazy game than he did a couple years ago. He looks like he’s coasting. I agree with Who that he doesn’t push himself to play at what his talent level would allow him to play at with more effort.
Okay, so how about last year when he averaged 28 ppg, 8.8 rpg, 7.3 apg, and 1.8 spg against the Cavs? Does that not count for anything, either?
Don't get me wrong - I can understand as to what it is that you're saying, here - I'm not completely absolving him from guilt/responsibility, but on the other hand, George was the best and most consistent player for the Thunder in that series against Utah, and prior to game 6, he was averaging 28.6 ppg, I believe.
I mean, I understand that it's easy for everyone to take a dump on the guy, right now, lol, but he's not the problem. Not even close, imo.