Team A
2 of team's top 6 contributors during final 24-12 (.667 winning %) stretch run entirely new to team (IT, Crowder).
2 of team's top 6 acquired at start of the season, team had previously underwhelmed with them for a half season (ET, Zeller).
1 of the team's top 6 a rookie (Smart).
Final contributor part of team for a season or more prior, team had previously underwhelmed with him for more than an entire year.
Team B
1 of team's top 6 contributors during final 13-6 (.684 winning %) stretch run entirely new to the team (Young).
1 of team's top 6 acquired at start of the season, team had previously underwhelmed with him for 3/4 of the season (Jack).
4 of team's top 6 part of team for a season or more than a season prior, team had previously underwhelmed with them for more than an entire year (Lopez, Williams, Johnson, Plumlee).
Which team had a greater correlation between their new acquisitions and winning basketball, team A or B? Which is more likely to finish .500 next season?