Question: Does winning games in the NCAA actually matter? The way I see it, its all about individual characteristics and performance that should matter most when evaluating a player. Apart from those loaded teams like Kentucky and Duke, when has winning in the NCAA translated to being a productive NBA player? Guys like Napier and Brice Johnson come to mind that won it all in the NCAA and were like the best players on their team, and are marginal role players/practice bodies in the NBA.
Also, I feel like Fultz is more dynamic that ET offensively. They can probably have similar impact on rebounding and assists, but from what I remember Turner was really good at that incredibly awkward and reliable crossover to create space for a dribble pull up, as well as the turn around jumper from the mid post. Fultz seems to have it all on offense, a reliable floater, crossover, excellent at finishing at the rim. It seems that also he is great at the 3 different 3 point shots (pull up, spot up, and the transition 3)