Would you take Tmac for the vet min?

[jdub1660]

Tmac, for 1.2 mil. Lets say he finally sees(just as Shaq did) that his services are no longer coveted for big money. Teams see him as great talent, but washed up/possible chemistry killer/injury prone.

So he agrees to jump our bandwagon, instead of Miami or LAL, and becomes the new Tony Allen with a jump shot. Take him or leave him?

Don't say he can't play D, b/c alot of lack of defense comes from 110% focus on scoring 30+ppg on teams with few real options on offense(take Ray for example)
He also scored 13 points in 30 seconds versus the Spurs. Yes, it was in his prime, but he is 2 years removed from the micro knee surgery.
Tmac for 10-15 good minutes per game at SF to play solid D and hit the open shot sounds perfect

a bench unit of Nate,Wafer,Tmac,BBD/JO, and Shaq. SICK!

[cdif911]

didn't he sign already?

[LB3533]

Why wouldn't you take a flier on him?

If he stinks, let him ride the pine.

Same deal with Mike Finley.

[cdif911]

yeah, he's def. on the Pistons, so this one is moot

[Celtics4ever]

I would not he is spent and shot.

[Boris Badenov]

a bench unit of Nate,Wafer,Tmac,BBD/JO, and Shaq. SICK!

If by "sick" you mean "generally incapable of playing due to physical ailments," I agree completely.

[jarufu]

That's a lot to pay for a bigmac, isn't it? . . Oh, tmac? Eww!

[GKC]

He's a defensive liability, and at this point in his career, despite his height, he can't play SF anymore and has to stick to SF, and could never really guard SF's anyway.

Here's the most important thing though; we have only ONE more roster spot, and its quite an important one. Maybe if we had 2 I'd do it.