Author Topic: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"  (Read 14686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #15 on: February 23, 2017, 03:14:28 PM »

Offline JOMVP

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1378
  • Tommy Points: 100
We needed interior size and rebounding. We didnt get it.
 

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2017, 03:14:36 PM »

Offline oldtype

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1677
  • Tommy Points: 143
Not even Bogut?
I don't get it. Are we not interested?
Why wait for buyout and fight other teams over his services when we have all this 2nd rounders...

Assuming he clears waivers we're probably first in line for him but yeah, huge mistake if we miss out on him.


Great words from a great man

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2017, 03:15:17 PM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11604
  • Tommy Points: 874
  • GOT IT!!!
Bogut is still in play for nothing if the Sixers buy him out.

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2017, 03:16:46 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
At least our best rebounder is back next week

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2017, 03:17:54 PM »

Offline GreenEnvy

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4553
  • Tommy Points: 1031
Butler or Bogut would have been nice, but I'm starting to get the feeling GM's try to get more from Ainge than from other GM's.
CELTICS 2024

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2017, 03:18:48 PM »

Offline Chief Macho

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1247
  • Tommy Points: 84
i'm p---ed.  couldn't even grab Noel?  or Tucker?   


looking forward to wasting more 1sts on players like Young, Rj, Rozier.

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2017, 03:18:48 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Thank god.   I genuinely think we would have regretted it hard had we given up the 2017 Brooklyn 1st for a non-superstar like Butler.  The pick has a chance to be a superstar and Butler wouldn't have gotten us over the hump.  We sure as hell could have regretted it had we given up the pick for a 1.3 year rental of Paul George before he flees to the Lakers.   

Then when you consider the rumor that Indy wasn't just asking for the Brooklyn pick, but also 3 of the 4 following players:  Smart, Jaylen, Bradley and Crowder...  it would have been downright moronic for us to make that move.

Neither CHicago or Indy was ever serious about making a deal.  They just wanted to see if they could fleece the Celtics into giving up 50 bucks on the dollar for a guy doesn't improve you enough to beat the Golden State Globetrotters. 

Fans will be upset, because they are impatient, want "action", don't understand big picture ramifications, the fact that the 2017 Brooklyn 1st has a reasonable chance to be a better player than Butler, don't realize we have a significant chance to sign a major free agent this summer, and don't realize that we wouldn't necessarily even be a better team by making a deal.   

People are dramatically undervaluing how great Bradley and Crowder have been this year.  I wouldn't have been surprised to see either average 20+ points playing on a bad team like Chicago.  They are great defenders and two of the most efficient shooters in the league this season.   Taking the ball out of Thomas hands late in the game makes no sense right now.  He's been terrific.   I really don't think adding one of those name brand stars would have improved us as much as people think.  They don't address our needs at all.

So glad our team didn't make a foolish short-sighted decision.  It's a major relief. 

Scoff at the dream of the Brooklyn 1st, but I genuinely believe the odds of that pick ending up a better player than Butler are greater than the odds a guy like Butler helps us beat Golden State during his 5 year window.

FWIW, It sounds like Bogut will be bought out and I'm pretty sure Golden State can't sign him (having traded him less than a year ago).  So I imagine we'll be one of the teams he'll consider.  He's a good fit here.   That's all we really need to make a good-faith run at a playoff push this year.   

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #22 on: February 23, 2017, 03:19:11 PM »

Offline KGBirdBias

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1649
  • Tommy Points: 125
It's official: Today belongs to the crickets.

Time to roll out the usual suspects:

Danny: "We tried, but no one was available at the right price."
Brad: "We really like the team we have."
Wyc: "I’m sure we’ll see fireworks this trade deadline this summer."

Seriously, no need to even interview these guys at this point.

That said, I’m not really upset. I hope Danny adds Bogut or a comparable big soon. Otherwise, bring on Lonzo Ball!!!  ;D

THIS 100% Sigh

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #23 on: February 23, 2017, 03:19:41 PM »

Offline YoungOne87

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1167
  • Tommy Points: 65
Boston Celtics: No deals. "Standing pat," source says.

this reminds me of dinner for one.
same old story over and over again...

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #24 on: February 23, 2017, 03:20:31 PM »

Offline alewilliam789

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1605
  • Tommy Points: 76
Bogut is still in play for nothing if the Sixers buy him out.

Most reports saying that Cleveland is the frontrunner. Makes sense seeing how he wants to get back at the Warriors for what they did to him

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #25 on: February 23, 2017, 03:20:48 PM »

Offline BringToughnessBack

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8088
  • Tommy Points: 941
https://youtu.be/QXCGnTy-v2M

Happy we didn't get fleeced like the former Nets GM.

Here is hoping Heyward needs to live in a big city or that Durant and Curry have a huge falling out when they get upset before the finals or that Westbrook decides best revenge is leaving the West and coming east or that George changes his LA crush in 18 due to fact that the Warriors are out west and better chance for finals trips in Beantown  ;D

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #26 on: February 23, 2017, 03:21:13 PM »

Offline alewilliam789

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1605
  • Tommy Points: 76
Terrence Jones getting waived. Should definitely look into him

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #27 on: February 23, 2017, 03:23:28 PM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11604
  • Tommy Points: 874
  • GOT IT!!!
Bogut is still in play for nothing if the Sixers buy him out.

Most reports saying that Cleveland is the frontrunner. Makes sense seeing how he wants to get back at the Warriors for what they did to him

If he goes to Cleveland and barely leaves the bench in the playoffs he's not that smart. Go ring chase all you want then.

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #28 on: February 23, 2017, 03:28:56 PM »

Offline BringToughnessBack

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8088
  • Tommy Points: 941
Bogut should be good for at least one game in the playoffs before he is out until next year. Are there any other centers who have been injured more over the past decade?

Re: Woj: Celtics "standing pat"
« Reply #29 on: February 23, 2017, 03:29:19 PM »

Offline rondofan1255

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4383
  • Tommy Points: 527
I'm glad nothing happened. :)