In an ironic life twist:
In the real world, for a lot of office jobs, there's a huge stigma if you're currently unemployed for more than 6+ months. Supposedly, a lot of HR people will automatically not consider your resume if they see you've been out of work for that long. If nobody has hired you yet, something must be wrong with you. Also a lesser, but similar stigma often exists if you try to go the management route but sit in one position too long without getting promoted.
I know these stigmas exist and absolutely hate it.
Now thinking about the next head coach. A lot of the names thrown out there, these guys have been assistants for 10+ years. And I find myself thinking something must be wrong with them if nobody has offered them a head coaching job yet.
Doc Rivers got a head coaching job right away and was COY in his first year.
Stevens went from college kid to assistant coach to D1 head coach to NBA coach by the time he was 36.
Guys like Ainge and Steve Kerr get GM and coaching jobs with out any experience and turn that into great stories of success.
These are the kinds of wunderkinds I want as the next Celtics coach.
I don't want Sam Cassell or Darvin Ham or any these guys that have been assistants for 10+ years. Something must be wrong with them if nobody has hired them yet. I want the guys that teams are fighting over who seemingly shoot to the top with no/minimal dues (don't worry, you don't have to point out how flawed this thinking is, I know guys who go this route often suck. Looking at you Jason Kidd, Mark Jackson, Steve Nash, Luke Walton, etc.)
Based on my faulty logic, Billups sounds like a good candidate (dude was being offered GM jobs right away, also seems like he'll have his choice of coaching offers). Kara Lawson, who very quickly went from player to analyst to NBA assistant to major D1 coach and now possibly NBA coach sounds even better!
I hate when HR and hiring managers treat people like this in the real world, now I find myself treating coaching candidates the same way. Go figure lol.