0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 07:00:36 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.I did want to participate. The hypothetical trade packages leave the C’s worse off. The other teams would be all over it, though. Now that I think about it, don’t think I’d even trade Tatum for Luka. Jayson is a better shooter, rebounder, and defender. Just a better two way player.
Quote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.
Quote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.
Quote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.
Quote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.
Quote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.
Quote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.
Realistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.
Quote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 07:45:18 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 07:00:36 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.I did want to participate. The hypothetical trade packages leave the C’s worse off. The other teams would be all over it, though. Now that I think about it, don’t think I’d even trade Tatum for Luka. Jayson is a better shooter, rebounder, and defender. Just a better two way player.? This is the only season where Tatum is averaging more rebounds than Luka, and Luka's career average is significantly higher than Tatum's. Confused by that statement.
Quote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 07:45:18 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 07:00:36 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.I did want to participate. The hypothetical trade packages leave the C’s worse off. The other teams would be all over it, though. Now that I think about it, don’t think I’d even trade Tatum for Luka. Jayson is a better shooter, rebounder, and defender. Just a better two way player.You do Luka for Tatum. It’s not a matter of who is better, it’s a matter of the better fit. Luka fits better with Brown.
Quote from: Ogaju on December 02, 2021, 08:21:49 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 07:45:18 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 07:00:36 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.I did want to participate. The hypothetical trade packages leave the C’s worse off. The other teams would be all over it, though. Now that I think about it, don’t think I’d even trade Tatum for Luka. Jayson is a better shooter, rebounder, and defender. Just a better two way player.You do Luka for Tatum. It’s not a matter of who is better, it’s a matter of the better fit. Luka fits better with Brown.I’m not sure that he would be a better fit. Doncic puts up Russell Westbrook like stats, but his team is barely over .500 and it’s not like he’s playing with bums either. Luka’s numbers are also down over the last two years.
Quote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 08:28:54 PMQuote from: Ogaju on December 02, 2021, 08:21:49 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 07:45:18 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 07:00:36 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.I did want to participate. The hypothetical trade packages leave the C’s worse off. The other teams would be all over it, though. Now that I think about it, don’t think I’d even trade Tatum for Luka. Jayson is a better shooter, rebounder, and defender. Just a better two way player.You do Luka for Tatum. It’s not a matter of who is better, it’s a matter of the better fit. Luka fits better with Brown.I’m not sure that he would be a better fit. Doncic puts up Russell Westbrook like stats, but his team is barely over .500 and it’s not like he’s playing with bums either. Luka’s numbers are also down over the last two years.Tatum and Luka is a better pairing than Brown and Luka...
Quote from: liam on December 02, 2021, 08:31:47 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 08:28:54 PMQuote from: Ogaju on December 02, 2021, 08:21:49 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 07:45:18 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 07:00:36 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.I did want to participate. The hypothetical trade packages leave the C’s worse off. The other teams would be all over it, though. Now that I think about it, don’t think I’d even trade Tatum for Luka. Jayson is a better shooter, rebounder, and defender. Just a better two way player.You do Luka for Tatum. It’s not a matter of who is better, it’s a matter of the better fit. Luka fits better with Brown.I’m not sure that he would be a better fit. Doncic puts up Russell Westbrook like stats, but his team is barely over .500 and it’s not like he’s playing with bums either. Luka’s numbers are also down over the last two years.Tatum and Luka is a better pairing than Brown and Luka...That I agree with. But I’d rather have a Tatum/Brown duo over Doncic/Brown.
Bane would've been such a good fit with Tatum and Brown...
Quote from: Ogaju on December 02, 2021, 08:21:49 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 07:45:18 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 07:00:36 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.I did want to participate. The hypothetical trade packages leave the C’s worse off. The other teams would be all over it, though. Now that I think about it, don’t think I’d even trade Tatum for Luka. Jayson is a better shooter, rebounder, and defender. Just a better two way player.You do Luka for Tatum. It’s not a matter of who is better, it’s a matter of the better fit. Luka fits better with Brown.Dallas wouldn't do that. Is Dallas better with Tatum than with Luka? No. Boston would be better...
Quote from: liam on December 02, 2021, 08:22:36 PMQuote from: Ogaju on December 02, 2021, 08:21:49 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 07:45:18 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 07:00:36 PMQuote from: Goldstar88 on December 02, 2021, 05:23:49 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 05:02:18 PMQuote from: slamtheking on December 02, 2021, 04:57:11 PMQuote from: todd_days_41 on December 02, 2021, 04:53:58 PMQuote from: gouki88 on December 02, 2021, 04:49:54 PMQuote from: LilRip on December 02, 2021, 04:30:56 PMRealistically, you’re probably either gettingPackage A: salary filler, 1 polarizing prospect and a bunch of picks+swaps. Package B: all-star on the last years of his prime and a pick or 2.Why is that realistic? Young stars would generate better returns than that.Agreed. Those aren't the likely outcomes of trading a young All-Star like Tatum.have to agree. C's wouldn't ship Tatum for anything less than an MVP candidate coming back. might mean adding something to Tatum to make it work but he's too good and important to this team to deal for spare parts or taking risks on players rehabbing their games physically/mentally.An MVP candidate? There's 2-3 in the league -- Tatum ain't even close to bein' one of 'em -- and none of them is getting traded for Tatum. He'd almost certainly be the best player in the deal, but I think the Cs would hold out for either another All-Star, or 2 really good young players & change.Yes, let’s trade a quarter for 3 nickel's. Top players under 25: #1: Luka #2: Tatum. Enough said.If you don’t want participate in the discussion — maybe don’t? It’s a hypothetical discussion of the best package one guy could fetch, so relax.I did want to participate. The hypothetical trade packages leave the C’s worse off. The other teams would be all over it, though. Now that I think about it, don’t think I’d even trade Tatum for Luka. Jayson is a better shooter, rebounder, and defender. Just a better two way player.You do Luka for Tatum. It’s not a matter of who is better, it’s a matter of the better fit. Luka fits better with Brown.Dallas wouldn't do that. Is Dallas better with Tatum than with Luka? No. Boston would be better...Agreed. Dallas is not trading Doncic for Tatum any day of the week and twice on Sunday.