Author Topic: GP still hatin on Rondo  (Read 8803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: GP still hatin on Rondo
« Reply #30 on: November 28, 2008, 07:13:22 PM »

Offline housecall

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2559
  • Tommy Points: 112
sig test..
Yea i second that,very nice sig...is that a new one out?tp for the sig.

Re: GP still hatin on Rondo
« Reply #31 on: November 28, 2008, 07:16:12 PM »

Offline housecall

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2559
  • Tommy Points: 112
sig test..

nice sig, TP
Crownsy did you have a good night the other night at the game?...it sounded loud from the TV.

Re: GP still hatin on Rondo
« Reply #32 on: November 28, 2008, 08:22:31 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
sig test..

nice sig, TP
Crownsy did you have a good night the other night at the game?...it sounded loud from the TV.

yea, it was awesome, got a good section, and the crowd was nuts during the comeback.

we even shook off the yoke of oppression that was the jumbo tron for the second half :D

was an awesome night, couldn't have asked for a better start to turkey day.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: GP still hatin on Rondo
« Reply #33 on: November 28, 2008, 11:46:08 PM »

Offline FierceLikePaulPierce

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 84
  • Tommy Points: 11
I was actually looking at the first two years.  I am not a Rondo hater by any means, but rather I was pointing out the futility in using the first two-years statistics of both players to make any comparison.

Just use your eyeballs.  Rondo clearly doesn't suck.  Period.

GP is just a curmudgeon (but GP was a better defender for what it's worth).

I think it was a pretty appropriate comparison. Definitely relevant to this thread, regardless of how useful the stats are in comparing how talented the two players were in their respective second years in the league and how good they were/will be when all is said and done.

I think you're just backing off now that you realize how off-base you were. If it's so futile to use those numbers to compare, why did you pick out specific stats from them to point out the numbers actually favored Payton (even though they didn't really)?

Isn't that "using the first two-years statistics of both players to make any comparison"?