Obviously 6 of 16 isn't very good but he did finish with 16 points, 6 rebounds, 5 assists, 2 steals, and a block with just 1 turnover. Pretty much everyone on the Sixers was atrocious yesterday also. They just got whipped by the Mavs
This is really interesting to me. We have all seen you use on off stats for a bunch of single games to make a point. Here Horford has a second worst minus 22 and you rattle off his counting stats. That is really interesting
The Sixers starters in that game were -19, -27, -18, -22, and then Scott who was -11, but played about 10 minutes (or more) less minutes than the other 4 starters. In other words, they were all terrible. If Horford was -22, but the other starters were all like -5, then there is something there, but in this game they were all atrocious and were all atrocious basically as a unit.
As for my focus on on/off, I use those because they show a player's importance to the scoreboard more than any other individual stat. If your team is significantly better when you are in the game then when you are on the bench, your value is clear. Tatum has cooled off since his super elite start, but he still also by far the best on/off per 100 differential of the 6 regular starters at +10.4 which is down from his great start, but is still borderline elite. In fact Brown, Smart, and Theis are all still negative in the on/off and Kemba and Gordon are both less than 1. The fact that Tatum is still so much higher than the other starters after 37 games says a great deal about just how important Tatum actually is to the team.