Well, at one point we had a stretch where we went 10-1 without KG in 2009. Sometimes teams can pull together when one of their stars is down. That doesn't mean the team is better without that player.
I've liked how the Celts have looked, too. However, the record alone isn't conclusive, and the agent is right: wait until the playoffs before making any long-term decisions.
Its not just that we won 6 in a row but its the way we're doing it. It looks alot better than the first 6 game winning streak we had. The one game we didn't look good in we still found a way to win *Raptors game*. Still I'm not convinced by any means.
We win against the Heat in Double OT, after we just had a Double OT and lost.
We handle the Sacremento Kings by double digits, a team that handled us by 20+ earlier in the season.
Handle the Magic.
Find a way to blow a lead with the Clippers and STILL win.
We win against Raptors after being down 10 in the 4th to come back and win by 5....in regulation.
We then turn around and beat the uptrending Lakers by 21 points, and led them by 30 at one point.
and these mean nothing to you? You do know that earlier in the season we would've lost to the Heat, the Clippers and the Raptors?
I just would love to know at what point are these wins 'conclusive' enough for you experts? lol. These are all night and day wins of losses we've endured....and still, nothing???
wow