You might find it interesting to read Stephen Shea's take:
http://www.basketballanalyticsbook.com/2015/05/06/the-nbas-most-underrated-player/
Also, regardless of the fact that he's "already played 4 seasons in the NBA", he's only 22. I think it would be a difficult assertion to support that he isn't likely to continue to improve his game over the next 5-10 years. Most NBA players don't reach peak athleticism until their late 20s and most continue to improve skills well into their 30s.
I've seen the said article, and it's not reliable by any means. There are two major flaws with the logic in that piece:
1 - Cherry picking of statsIt uses a unique set of statistical categories which are cherry-picked to try to push the writer's obvious opinion that Harris is a very special player.
This is VERY easy to do for just about any player in the league.
For example, how many players in the NBA this season averaged at least 15 points, 10 rebounds and 2 assists while shooting 49% from the field? Only three - Anthony Davis, Greg Monroe and Pau Gasol.
So this must make Monroe an incredible player - a generational talent. I mean, pout of 475 active NBA players there are only two other guys who can do what Monroe does, and that's despite a far reduced offensive role (he's the only guy of the three who averaged < 14 FGA to reach those 15 PPG)
Of course we all know that's not true.
I could really easily do the same with Nerlens Noel since he's the only player in the NBA ranking top 10 in both steals and blocks, so BAM - instantly superstar in the making right there. He must be really special because that only took TWO statistical categories.
Monroe is a very nice player, but he's not at that special a level just yet. Likewise Noel has some great talent, but is a completely one dimensional player. The above just goes to show how you can make almost ANY decent player in the NBA look really unique/special by carefully cherry picking a few select stats.
I'm sure you get my point!
2- Completley ignored player historyThe entire argument of this article is based on Harris' ability to rebound and shoot threes at a very good rate.
It completely ignores the fact that over his
four NBA seasons, Harris has only shot above 32% from three
once - which happens to be this season that just ended.
* In 2011-12 he shot 26.1%
* In 2012-13 he shot 31.5%
* In 2013-14 he shot 25.4%
* In 2014-15 he shot 36.4%
How on earth can you POSSIBLY argue that a guy who shot 36.4% (which is a good, but hardly elite number) in one season out of four is any form of conclusive evidence that this guy is legitimately a high quality NBA shooter?
Harris has a career three point percentage of 32.1%, so if you go off their careers so far then Avery Bradley (36%), Marcus Smart (33.5%) and Kelly Olynyk (34.9%) are all significantly better three point shooters.
Oh but "he's only 22 years old" they say. But "look how he's improved this year!" they say.
Well Every Bradley shot 31.7% from three when he was 22 years old in 2012-13 and then went on to shoot 39.5% from three as a 23 year old in 2013-14. He showed a massive improvement as a shooter in 2013-14 as a 23 year old going in to a contract year - sound familiar?
Again, a nicely written article that does a good job of pushing the writers theories, but sadly it has all of about zero substance to it.
All those Boston fans who love to say Bradley has no upside last year and didn't deserve his $8M or so contract (because he's already been in the NBA 4 seasons and hasn't shown any improvement) have absolutely rational reason to think any different about Harris. He has had a very similar career progression to Bradley up to his fourth season.
You don't have a clue
You know what, I am seriously in awe at the power of your argument. So much so that I will concede defeat and openly admit that you are right - I am convinced.
Actually I just had a bit of a think about it and despite your highly compelling argument, I think I'm still a little skeptical. For now i'll just stick to the conclusion that the FACTS project.
Been wanting Harris since last year. Any c's fan that doesn't has no clue about the team needs.
Why?
Please do tell me what Harris offers that this team desperately need.
Three point shooting at the wing position? I agree, we do need that.
Believe me though, there are a LOT of guys out there who are much more proven as three point shooters than Harris..as he hasn't really proven that much over the one single statistical single season of his life in which he actually shot a percentage that even remotely above mediocre.
Defense? Nope, he's one of the bottom 10% of so among all Small Forwards.
Outright scoring? Nope, he scored at a similar rate to Bradley and Jeff Green, and they haven't gotten us that far.
Ok he's a solid rebounder at the SF spot, but are you really going to use THAT as justification for throwing this guy a $13M - $15M contract???