Author Topic: Would you rather have an undersized SG or an undersized PF? (Read 3904 times)

syfy9 · « **on:** April 22, 2013, 11:46:17 PM »

Because all SGs and PFs can't be 6'7 and 6'11 respectively (no idea why

), if you were designing a team, would you rather have an undersized player at the 2 or the 4? Given that they are both identical players respectively.

KGs Knee · « **Reply #1 on:** April 23, 2013, 12:00:07 AM »

Can I get a 6'11" SG?

bfrombleacher · « **Reply #2 on:** April 23, 2013, 12:08:15 AM »

What do you mean by identical?

ManUp · « **Reply #3 on:** April 23, 2013, 12:11:56 AM »

Undersized shooting guard, power forwards need to be able to contest shots at the rim.

CelticConcourse · « **Reply #4 on:** April 23, 2013, 12:13:51 AM »

Both. I'm a Celtics fan.

BASS_THUMPER · « **Reply #5 on:** April 23, 2013, 12:24:57 AM »

under size sg

under size pf would get kicked around

Author Topic: Would you rather have an undersized SG or an undersized PF? (Read 3904 times)

Would you rather have an undersized SG or an undersized PF?

syfy9

Re: Would you rather have an undersized SG or an undersized PF?

KGs Knee

Re: Would you rather have an undersized SG or an undersized PF?

bfrombleacher

Re: Would you rather have an undersized SG or an undersized PF?

ManUp

Re: Would you rather have an undersized SG or an undersized PF?

CelticConcourse

Re: Would you rather have an undersized SG or an undersized PF?

BASS_THUMPER

Hello! Guest

Latest Discussions