So apparently, this kid was suspended for something like 8 games last year. Reports on the internet seem inconsistent, from smoking weed to stealing laptops.
The fact that St. Joe's wasted a scholarship on a suspended player last year, and then had O'Brien seek to transfer at the end of the signing period (meaning the school couldn't readily find a replacement) is at least a reason for Martelli's anger. This kid got a free education, and it doesn't sound like he gave back a heck of a lot to the team, on the floor or off.
Again, I think it's vindictive and petty to not let him play. At the same time, maybe this guy isn't the choir boy he portrayed himself as.
He graduated. He could have just gone somewhere anyway. Happens a fair amount of the time actually at the smaller schools.
Well, he didn't technically graduate, right? He was just allowed to march at graduation, but had to make up summer classes (at St. Joseph's expense).
And, the point is, he *couldn't* just leave and play somewhere else. For whatever reason (we don't know the facts) the NCAA has twice upheld the decision to not let him play, so there's obviously something going on.
Again, I think this is driven by anger, but I don't this this kid's self-serving story is one that we should buy without a little critical thinking.
If this kid really is a thief, if he's really a jerk, and if he really milked the university here (all of which some St. Joe's fans have alleged), then I totally understand Martelli's sentiment, even if I don't agree with it.