Article is harsh but it's also realistic.
Everyone is saying 'why trade him now, why not wait till his value goes back up'. What if his value doesn't go back up?
We have 2 seasons left and in those two seasons you'd assume if we don't put a contending cast around him then he's gone as a free agent in 2015 anyway.
Look at his defense as an example- he used to be an absolute pitbull, but as time's gone by, it's regressed.
It's a perfectly reasonable argument to question that without the good shooters he had around him for the past 5 seasons, that his stats and game will suffer. He has improved his jumpshot but I don't know if the perception about his jumpshot has changed that much.
People are calling it all lies and misinformation but the stats he's given aren't made up. ACL injuries generally induce a decline. Add that to the probability that now Rondo will carry more of a load on his shoulders offensively than ever before and his rough and tumble style of play is going to increase as well.
I love him. He's a warrior. He's been Edited. Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline. on by critics for having NBA legends as team mates. I don't think this writer has been completely fair but he hasn't been completely unfair as some on Celticsblog are suggesting.
I see two options for Ainge.
Trade Rondo and keep Humphries and Wallace (if he can't package one of them in a Rondo trade). Or move Wallace and Humphries and let Rondo stay, hoping to bink a 2014 top 5 pick and then reloading around the pick and Rondo in 2015 free agency.
Keeping Rondo, Humphries and Wallace just makes us slightly too good to be anything other than mediocre/wasting our time.
Wyc, Danny and the owners are 'championship or bust' kinda guys. Sputtering through to the 8th seed or 10th place in the East is not going to happen under their guide.