In a heartbeat. I highly doubt Smart will be half the player Bledsoe is and he was taken at the 18th overall pick. He was also a freshman coming out of college and played second fiddle to Wall so there was at least a reason for him being a little raw coming out of college. Smart had two whole years with his own team and then got more minutes in his rookie season and he still couldn't put up better stats.
#1. Smart was younger during his debut NBA season than Bledsoe. So someone could use Smart's younger age as an excuse for being "raw" during his rookie year.
#2. Bledsoe played 30mpg for 37 games during his season at Kentucky. He had plenty of experience coming out of college, especially considering that Kentucky is by far a better NBA farm team than Oklahoma State.
#3. Bledsoe played MORE minutes in his NBA rookie season than Marcus Smart.
#4. Smart outplayed Bledsoe when comparing their rookie years. Bledsoe has an edge in some offensive categories like assists, but he also has the lead in negative categories like turnovers. Smart is the far better defender of the two. Smart has a massive advantage when looking at statistics like win shares, ORtg, DRtg, BPM and VORP. In fact, there's not any advanced metric where Bledsoe has an advantage over Smart.
In short, you're factually wrong on some points and your assumptions on others aren't really valid. Now compare the fact that Bledsoe is getting paid $13.5m this year and Marcus Smart is getting paid $3.5m - the difference of a Gerald Wallace contract. Bledsoe will be the better player this year but Smart could very well be the better player in 2-3 years (NBA players peak at 24-25) when this team may be ready to compete for a championship and in the meanwhile he's a LOT cheaper.