So basically the pro Smart crowd used to make the case that we needed to keep Smart because he was the better player. Now they make the case that we need to keep Smart because Rozier is the better player
I'm not sure who argued that but my reasons have nothing to do with thinking Rozier is better or worse. My argument is based strictly within the context of our team going forward. I firmly believe that Smart is more valuable on a team with Kyrie, Hayward, Horford, Tatum, and Jaylen. The discrepancy in value only increases once we face an elite team like Golden State or Houston. Rozier is proving to be an extremely clutch shot maker but he still doesn't impact the overall outcome over the course of 30+ minutes in the same way that Marcus does. I simply believe that Marcus has a larger impact over 50-60 possessions than Rozier. Let's also not forget that Marcus has made plenty of clutch plays in big games. If I was a borderline playoff team that needed scoring punch then Rozier might be my choice.
Does everyone remember when Curry dropped 49 points against us in a tight game against the Warriors? Does this happen if Marcus Smart had been playing? Most likely not. Brad has also cited Marcus as the real defensive leader when Horford is on the bench. This type of leadership will make a real impact when we play elite teams on the biggest stage. How many times have we seen Marcus come up with a steal, assist or score a bucket, and then take a charge in the 4th quarter, all on consecutive possessions?