The Rondacolytes hear what they wanna hear. Even if contradicting evidence is out there.
The same is true of Rondohaters. Your both extremes of a spectrum with polarizing views that ignore anything that does not agrees with you. There is plenty of evidence to support both sides.
exactly.
This is the part where we point out that what just happened was this:
scary jerry was saying that Jackie Mack can't be trusted because she hates Rondo, a flattering article about Rondo, written by JMac, was posted, and all of a sudden it became one of those annoying false equivalencies where "but guys the Rondo haters are living in denial too!," which had exactly zero relevance to the point at hand -- namely that the people who think McMullan has a personal axe to grind with Rondo are allowing that belief to color their interpretation of her statements as clear examples of bias, while avoiding any evidence of her saying/writing/demonstrating anything other than dislike for Rondo.
And now my brain hurts because of all the dumb leaps I just had to describe.