Author Topic: trade idea revisited: rondo for westrbook  (Read 25104 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: trade idea revisited: rondo for westrbook
« Reply #90 on: January 31, 2014, 12:38:22 AM »

Offline Vox_Populi

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4468
  • Tommy Points: 346
Even though he's past his prime, he can't be THAT bad yet.
*sigh*

Re: trade idea revisited: rondo for westrbook
« Reply #91 on: January 31, 2014, 08:51:41 AM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
I expected 12 points, 8 assists, 4 rebounds 1.5 steal 3 turnovers on 44%/30%/60% shooting in about 32 minutes per game.   Hopefully he still has that in him.   Solid fringe all-star player.  Top 20 PG.   Right now he's been horrible.  It's just odd, because he said he wasn't coming back until he was 100% healthy. 

  Healthy obviously meant his knee was healed, meaning he wasn't really risking re-injury by coming back early. It didn't mean he'd be 100% full speed and showing no effects of the knee injury. What did you think, he was going to spend the next 8-12 months playing in the D-League until he was completely back to his pre-injury form?

Re: trade idea revisited: rondo for westrbook
« Reply #92 on: January 31, 2014, 09:25:39 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11414
  • Tommy Points: 870
I think Westbrook is a more valuable overall player than Rondo but I don't think a team goes far with Westbrook as their best player anymore than a team would with Rondo as their best player.  So for that reason, I don't think I would try too hard to trade for Westbrook.

In terms of the off topic debate about how recovered or rusty Rondo is now, he should not be on the court if he is not healthy.  If he is healthy, there is no reason for him to not be "in shape" by now.

So I am assuming that we have a healthy and in shape player who is not sharp, working on timing, getting used to new players and a new coach/system.  It is kind of like when a player gets traded, that player needs time to figure things out.

With Rondo though, he has been with the team every day including preseason.  He should be pretty well schooled on the system and the other players from watching.  Playing is different than watching of course but it should not be that tough for a player as smart as Rondo to get past the learning the players/system aspect in this situation.

So now we have a healthy player, who should be in shape, and should know the players and systems just fine.  All that leaves is the "rust" (timing, touch, rhythm, etc.).

I would have expected to see more from Rondo at this point so I fear he may not be "healthy" or in shape or full strength (whatever you call it).  If that is the case, I criticize the Celtics for having him on the court.  Even in a tank year, I don't see why you would do that.  If he is healthy/full strength and what we are seeing is due to other factors (rust, lesser supporting cast, limitations that were always there, etc) that could be even worse.

Re: trade idea revisited: rondo for westrbook
« Reply #93 on: January 31, 2014, 10:01:21 AM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
I think Westbrook is a more valuable overall player than Rondo but I don't think a team goes far with Westbrook as their best player anymore than a team would with Rondo as their best player.  So for that reason, I don't think I would try too hard to trade for Westbrook.

In terms of the off topic debate about how recovered or rusty Rondo is now, he should not be on the court if he is not healthy.  If he is healthy, there is no reason for him to not be "in shape" by now.

So I am assuming that we have a healthy and in shape player who is not sharp, working on timing, getting used to new players and a new coach/system.  It is kind of like when a player gets traded, that player needs time to figure things out.

With Rondo though, he has been with the team every day including preseason.  He should be pretty well schooled on the system and the other players from watching.  Playing is different than watching of course but it should not be that tough for a player as smart as Rondo to get past the learning the players/system aspect in this situation.

So now we have a healthy player, who should be in shape, and should know the players and systems just fine.  All that leaves is the "rust" (timing, touch, rhythm, etc.).

I would have expected to see more from Rondo at this point so I fear he may not be "healthy" or in shape or full strength (whatever you call it).  If that is the case, I criticize the Celtics for having him on the court.  Even in a tank year, I don't see why you would do that.  If he is healthy/full strength and what we are seeing is due to other factors (rust, lesser supporting cast, limitations that were always there, etc) that could be even worse.

  Players typically take a year or more to get back to full speed after they return from knee injuries. But they have to be playing games for much of the recovery to occur. Rondo was back on the court within a month of being cleared for contact and looked pretty bad. Rose waited 9-10 months after being medically cleared to play ball and he still looked pretty bad. Holding Rondo out for the season would shorten his recovery time somewhat but it would still significantly delay the time it took from now until he's back to full speed.