Well if IP needs someone to argue for his team, given what he has done for me in the Historical Draft and for others in being co-commish and finishing off Cleveland's team in this draft, I will do it for him.
Seems onlt fair that someone pick up the slack for him when he has done it for so many otger people.
But ...... only if he wants
That'd be really helpful, thanks Nick!
Since there's no way nick is going to vote against a team he's advocating for, I assume this means that IP / nick only get one playoff vote between them?
Lol..always the lawyer. Well before I even offered I said I had Chicago in the Finals so wouldn' t a better way of doing it be to allow both of our votes until the Finals and then discount my vote.
Honestly, I think somebody arguing for IP is a classy thing to do. However, if he's going to essentially have a co-GM, I think that co-GM has to be bound by the same rules as other co-GMs. Otherwise, it's not fair to other teams in the East, and potentially, the Finals. Edgar and I, SO and KC, and Lucky and Rebus all have different ideas of who would advance, except for the fact that we're in lockstep that our own teams would win. (Well, except for SO, who favors Dallas, to his eternal credit.) I see it the same way as you and IP at this stage.
As much as I like IP, he shouldn't get two automatic votes.