I'm wondering, would the Nets have been better off doing a Kyrie trade with the Lakers, and then tried to do a follow up trade with Utah?
Trade one: Nets trade Kyrie to Lakers for two #1s, Westbrook, Bryant
Trade two: Nets trade Westbrook, protected Lakers #1 for Conley/Russell, Beasley, Vanderbilt
Could a Nets team that added Russell or Conley, along with Beasley, Vanderbilt and Bryant instead of Kyrie have been better? Under that circumstance, they'd still have a future Lakers pick to rebuild with, with a decent win-now roster.
Most importantly, could Durant have lived with that?