Gerald Green.
But seriously, I wouldn't necessarily say that we almost never see that combination. It's becoming a lot more ordinary.
Vince Carter immediately jumps to mind as another guy from Ray's era. But in today's NBA, many great athletic wings can also hit the three at a high proficiency. On our team, but JT and JB can both dunk and shoot very well. Lebron. Donovan Mitchell. Zach Lavine. Many others.
Tatum doesn’t have elite athleticism (for NBA standards) and Brown couldn’t shoot well coming out of college.
Vince Carter, Zach LaVine & Donovan Mitchell are great examples, but LeBron couldn’t shoot coming into the NBA.
I don't see the distinction between a great natural shooter versus a great developed shooter, but your thread, your rules.
I'll fight you to the death on JT not being a great dunker, though. He's one of the better in-game dunkers in the NBA, and he's posterized some pretty impressive names.
Tatum’s vertical leap isn’t elite, though I do know what you mean.
The simplest way to describe my parameters is a player coming into the NBA that would be good enough to be in the dunk contest & the three point contest.
There's been several guys that have done that though (compete in both the 3 and dunk contest).
Michael Cooper, Clyde Drexler, Michael Jordan, Kenny Smith, Nick Anderson, Allan Houston, Brent Barry, Ray Allen, Damian Lillard, Paul George, Bobby Sura all have competed in both the 3point and and Dunk contests.
Now not all of them are considered good 3 point shooters (Jordan), but several of them are (or at least were for their eras).
On top of that you have guys who were known as shooters (Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf, Rex Chapman) who competed in the dunk contest, but never the 3 point contest.