If Draymond doesn’t serve a severe suspension and possible criminal charges then the team/league is protecting the on-court products over their supposed morals— full stop.
It is not morals. It is PR.
---------------------------------------------------
Rambling on ...
So much of this nonsense is fake morality as a form of virtue signaling. Showing how good of a person you are by how willing you to severely punish whatever offense occured. The larger the punishment the more moral a human being you are. The better the human being you are.
Whether that is the one doing the punishing (team owners, league front office) or folks calling for more severe punishments (fans on social media).
"I prove how good of a person I am by showing everyone how severe a punishment I'd give this other person" and the punishments just keep escalating and escalating ... to the point they are no longer connected the original offense / crime. It is not about the offense. It is about the virtue signalling of morality for the punishers and the mob foaming at the mouth calling for more punishment.
I can certainly acknowledge that virtue signaling exists, but I don't see it as a useful argument on its own. Maybe in the most absurd cases, but any point of view can be accused of signaling at any time, not just limited to woke "virtue". Included in this is *calling out* virtue signaling, which can be a way of positioning yourself as the realist, the honest, the worldly, the experienced, etc. We could go in circles all day supposing that the other guy is being dishonest. It doesn't accomplish much beyond a signaling contest.
Same thing with "cancel culture". Yup, the mob mentality exists, it's a problem, but it's become an excuse of its own.
Sarver, Udoka and Green all deserve to lose their jobs. So did Donald Sterling. So did Harvey Weinstein.
In the NBA, there's some small precedent for punching people in the face. I get it. "It's part of the game". That doesn't mean you're the morality police if you think it's bull, and that pro athletes don't need to be coddled through committing felonies just because it's happened before. Precedent as a morality argument is a trainwreck for obvious reasons.
It's like there's an insinuation that the ones calling for punishment are being sensitive babies. Nah. Draymond Green is a child, who threw a violent tantrum. I have minimal respect for him as a human being, because his basketball skills just aren't that special compared to every other working adult who doesn't get to pull this kind of (junk). Personal responsibility and all.