I would so much rather have an elite pick and roll scorer type prospect than a guy who projects as a kind of Gerald Wallace / Joe Johnson / Andre Iguodala type player.
Look, if we were sitting at #3 after the lottery I'd be all about Josh Jackson.
Fultz is a better prospect.
I know we already have a great lead scoring guard in Thomas, but he won't last forever. To me the value of a prospect like Fultz is exponentially higher than a guy like Jackson.
The chances of him becoming another tweener who can't shoot (e.g. MKG, Winslow, Johnson, etc) seem a lot higher than the chance he becomes Kawhi Leonard.
If it helps, think of Jackson as a Paul Pierce type. And Fultz as CJ McCollum. That's in play.
I think in today's league the McCollum type prospect is more valuable.
Than Paul Pierce?! Crazy talk. All this offensive hoopla, 3 point shooting stuff has gone too far. Paul Pierce. The Truth. Elite 2-way wing, NBA finals MVP. Like Kawhi, Lebron, iguodala, Kobe, Durant. 6'4" scorers are much easier to find.
Look, I love Paul Pierce. Love him.
But it's a pick and roll league now.
Pierce was best as an iso scorer, though he developed as a playmaker and defender later in his career.
If we're talking in a vacuum, I'll take the potential elite pick and roll scorer with a nice jumper over the big wing with iso / playmaker potential.
Again, chances are Jackson does not turn into Kawhi Leonard or anything like it. More likely he's Harrison Barnes, or maybe Andre Iguodala.
It's so much easier to "make it" as a pick and roll scorer with nice handles and a good jumper than to be the swiss army knife freak athlete.