QUESTION: If Rozier and the Pelicans agree to some deal in a S&T scenario and that's included in the trade, is his average salary included in the deal or half of that?
For example, say Rozier and NOP agrees to like 4/60M (15M/Year), so if Rozier is in the trade package, does it count as 15M in the trade or 7.5M? That's important when determining what to trade for AD since getting close to matching his 27M salary will also be key.
For New Orleans it would count as $15 million incoming but for Boston only $7.5 million outgoing so it makes it very difficult to match. So let's examine:
Boston trade Rozier Tatum and Brown..$15 million + $6.7 million + $5.1 million = $26.8 million
New Orleans trades AD...$25.4 million
Obviously both salaries are within 25% of each other...but
New Orleans outgoing $25.4 million
New Orleans incoming $26.8 million
The trade works for New Orleans incoming and outgoing salaries within 25%
Boston outgoing salary: $26.8 million - $7.5 million = $19.3 million because you only count $7.5 million instead of $15 million
Boston incoming salary for AD: $25.4 million
$19.3 × 1.25 = 24.125 which means Boston has to have incoming salary no higher than $24.225 million and obviously $26.8 million is higher than allowed so the trade doesn't work.
This trade is looking to be almost impossible to do. We don't know if NO would even want Rozier and as an UF, he has some leverage to dictate where he's traded to. Horford can opt out so I doubt he's a part of a trade. I don't think they're trading Hayward and NO probably wouldn't be interested anyway. Meanwhile, the Sac pick is looking worse all the time.
Yeah, I detailed that in an earlier post.
You took over for FLCeltsFan, you taking over for saltlover too?
Couldn't a pick heavy trade work, using the 30-day rule that we saw with Andrew Wiggins?
Best case scenario is Boston has:
#2 (from Kings, don't give up hope!)
#9 (from Griz)
#15 (from LAC)
+Boston's own (I hope it's #30, but for trade purposes it's probably better at #16).
Using 120% of the 2020 rookie scale:2, 9, 15, 30 = $15.3m (best case)
10, 12, 15, 25 = $11.2m (realistic case?)
18, 20, 21, 23 = $8.5m (current standings)
So Boston selects the picks for NO, but still signs the players and just trades them in 30 days.
Something like Brown ($6.5m) + Rozier ($15m) + 4 rookies ($10m-$15m) would equal somewhere between $24m-$29m for Boston and $31.5m-$36.6m for NO.
Not counting Davis, the Pelicans only have 5 players under contract for next year + 1 team option (Okafor, probably not going to be picked up) + 1 player option (Randle, will probably opt out), so they can handle a 6-for-1 trade and will be well under the cap.
With my green tinted glasses on, that sounds like a good package for a team that would immediately start to rebuild (assuming picks are at least decent).
This could work theoretically right? Or am I missing some major CBA rule?