I don't see Jordan ever change his game to support Pippen. It was the other way around.
I disagree. Jordan changed his game for the betterment of his team, going from a guy who averaged around 33/8/8 to a player putting up 30/5/5. Jordan was willing to give up the ball more, playing within the offense rather than a guy who needed the ball for the first 20 seconds of the 24 second clock. Obviously the offense was still run around Jordan, but he scored less and got fewer assists and rebounds, because he learned to trust his teammates, not only to make open baskets, but to do the right things when needed. Jordan also became a better outside shooter and better defender as time went on.
Now, Jordan probably didn't change his game drastically, but he absolutely did modify his player to better mesh with his teammates, which is all anybody is asking Lebron to do.
A few points though. MJ was older than James when he changed his game. His numbers went down but his usage% was about the same between those two years. And the change was slight, so one could argue that the change to LeBron's game this year is as significant as the change to MJ's game. One big difference was that the Bulls roster was continually tailored to MJ's game while LeBron is now on a team that isn't conducive to his game.
LOL....Exactly what team would be conducive to the messiah's game? He's the ultimate role player already....He plays every role on his team to the detriment of his teammates.
The best illustration is Shaq. When Shaq is on the court this season, his teammates play to his unique talents to the benefit of the team. When Shaq was on the court last season, the messiah played to the messiah's talents and Shaq's talent was neutralized.
The messiah is the modern day Iverson.
Teams that the messiah plays for...(And like Iverson, there will be many teams he plays for) Will continually tinker, retune, and overhaul their rosters so they're "conducive" to the messiah's game....With the same result.
Ultimately the messiah will end up a more talented, dynamic, but ultimately equally successful version of Iverson.
Jordan, Jabbar, Duncan, Bird, Garnett, Bryant, etc care/cared about winning above their marketability. The difference between them and the messiah is that their marketability was a result of their team's success. It's most noteworthy with Bryant and Jabbar because they won championships with completely different rosters. The messiah doesn't have to have the success they did to be more marketable than they were. IMHO, the coddling and ridiculous overt officiating partiality the messiah gets on the court has hurt his game. Winning stroked/strokes the above egos. The messiah is wired different.