Hi nice people (mostly)!! Can anyone tell me where to find how well we do or don't do when Al and Baynes combine for 20+pts. I have a theory that I want to check the numbers on. I believe that the games where those 2 provide offense and a credible threat it seems to be games we win but when they aren't productive on offense we either barely win, lose or get blown out. I may not be on to anything but I sure have been saying and feeling that way for months. It's as if when our bigs aren't offenders the team doesn't play well.
Baynes and Horford combined score vs.
Raps 8
Was 14
Pacers 16
Cavs 11
I haven't looked back further than that but I can remember a lot of games that I thought this, it seems like if they shoot well we are either winning or a hair from pulling it out. I think it's because our offense is so big centric that when they aren't clicking it hurts. After the streak it seems like we gotta darn near pray for Baynes to be productive on offense, he seems like he misses all the bunnies. I think we are even more handicapped when Horford doesn't score, hovering around 10pts in those games, it's no wonder we look bad.