0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Soooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?
Quote from: Ogaju on January 31, 2018, 10:17:55 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:12:50 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:03:07 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:02:00 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:58:55 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:56:34 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:55:52 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.Again guys there needs to be some intent, not only was intent lacking but he made a play for the block meaning its not a flagrant. It was a foul tho, that the refs missed."Flagrant foul. In basketball, a flagrant foul is a personal foul that involves excessive or violent contact that could injure the fouled player. A flagrant foul may be unintentional or purposeful; the latter type is also called an "intentional foul" in the NBA."Exactly. Intent is not a definition of it.Al got one early in the year when a guard was on the switch, so when he did a drop step and swung his elbow it was at the guard's head. They called it. He wasn't even looking so it wasn't intentional. That's not part of that rule.Ya, and that shouldn't of been a flagrant. Neither should that on Morris. Contact was made, but it wasn't excessive. Granted the play result in injury but that was more because Morris was off balance hanging on the rim. It was unfortunate. Not a flagrant."contact that could injure the fouled player"So every contact that results in an injury to a player is a flagrant? Obviously not. There has to be excessive contact, there wasn't. Its unfortunate that Morris was injured but it was incidental. But reasonable people can agree to disagree. I'm just a little tired of every little bit of contact being a flagrant.No, it was not incidental... it was a breakaway foul. Morris was ahead of Beasley who really had no play on the ball without making contact with a defenseless airborne Morris. It was a bush league play similar to what caused Heyward's injury. NBA should do something about this.I agree. It was head hunting at it's finest. Morris falling like that should've tipped the refs that he was hit.
Quote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:12:50 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:03:07 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:02:00 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:58:55 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:56:34 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:55:52 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.Again guys there needs to be some intent, not only was intent lacking but he made a play for the block meaning its not a flagrant. It was a foul tho, that the refs missed."Flagrant foul. In basketball, a flagrant foul is a personal foul that involves excessive or violent contact that could injure the fouled player. A flagrant foul may be unintentional or purposeful; the latter type is also called an "intentional foul" in the NBA."Exactly. Intent is not a definition of it.Al got one early in the year when a guard was on the switch, so when he did a drop step and swung his elbow it was at the guard's head. They called it. He wasn't even looking so it wasn't intentional. That's not part of that rule.Ya, and that shouldn't of been a flagrant. Neither should that on Morris. Contact was made, but it wasn't excessive. Granted the play result in injury but that was more because Morris was off balance hanging on the rim. It was unfortunate. Not a flagrant."contact that could injure the fouled player"So every contact that results in an injury to a player is a flagrant? Obviously not. There has to be excessive contact, there wasn't. Its unfortunate that Morris was injured but it was incidental. But reasonable people can agree to disagree. I'm just a little tired of every little bit of contact being a flagrant.No, it was not incidental... it was a breakaway foul. Morris was ahead of Beasley who really had no play on the ball without making contact with a defenseless airborne Morris. It was a bush league play similar to what caused Heyward's injury. NBA should do something about this.
Quote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:03:07 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:02:00 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:58:55 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:56:34 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:55:52 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.Again guys there needs to be some intent, not only was intent lacking but he made a play for the block meaning its not a flagrant. It was a foul tho, that the refs missed."Flagrant foul. In basketball, a flagrant foul is a personal foul that involves excessive or violent contact that could injure the fouled player. A flagrant foul may be unintentional or purposeful; the latter type is also called an "intentional foul" in the NBA."Exactly. Intent is not a definition of it.Al got one early in the year when a guard was on the switch, so when he did a drop step and swung his elbow it was at the guard's head. They called it. He wasn't even looking so it wasn't intentional. That's not part of that rule.Ya, and that shouldn't of been a flagrant. Neither should that on Morris. Contact was made, but it wasn't excessive. Granted the play result in injury but that was more because Morris was off balance hanging on the rim. It was unfortunate. Not a flagrant."contact that could injure the fouled player"So every contact that results in an injury to a player is a flagrant? Obviously not. There has to be excessive contact, there wasn't. Its unfortunate that Morris was injured but it was incidental. But reasonable people can agree to disagree. I'm just a little tired of every little bit of contact being a flagrant.
Quote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:02:00 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:58:55 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:56:34 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:55:52 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.Again guys there needs to be some intent, not only was intent lacking but he made a play for the block meaning its not a flagrant. It was a foul tho, that the refs missed."Flagrant foul. In basketball, a flagrant foul is a personal foul that involves excessive or violent contact that could injure the fouled player. A flagrant foul may be unintentional or purposeful; the latter type is also called an "intentional foul" in the NBA."Exactly. Intent is not a definition of it.Al got one early in the year when a guard was on the switch, so when he did a drop step and swung his elbow it was at the guard's head. They called it. He wasn't even looking so it wasn't intentional. That's not part of that rule.Ya, and that shouldn't of been a flagrant. Neither should that on Morris. Contact was made, but it wasn't excessive. Granted the play result in injury but that was more because Morris was off balance hanging on the rim. It was unfortunate. Not a flagrant."contact that could injure the fouled player"
Quote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:58:55 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:56:34 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:55:52 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.Again guys there needs to be some intent, not only was intent lacking but he made a play for the block meaning its not a flagrant. It was a foul tho, that the refs missed."Flagrant foul. In basketball, a flagrant foul is a personal foul that involves excessive or violent contact that could injure the fouled player. A flagrant foul may be unintentional or purposeful; the latter type is also called an "intentional foul" in the NBA."Exactly. Intent is not a definition of it.Al got one early in the year when a guard was on the switch, so when he did a drop step and swung his elbow it was at the guard's head. They called it. He wasn't even looking so it wasn't intentional. That's not part of that rule.Ya, and that shouldn't of been a flagrant. Neither should that on Morris. Contact was made, but it wasn't excessive. Granted the play result in injury but that was more because Morris was off balance hanging on the rim. It was unfortunate. Not a flagrant.
Quote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:56:34 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:55:52 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.Again guys there needs to be some intent, not only was intent lacking but he made a play for the block meaning its not a flagrant. It was a foul tho, that the refs missed."Flagrant foul. In basketball, a flagrant foul is a personal foul that involves excessive or violent contact that could injure the fouled player. A flagrant foul may be unintentional or purposeful; the latter type is also called an "intentional foul" in the NBA."Exactly. Intent is not a definition of it.Al got one early in the year when a guard was on the switch, so when he did a drop step and swung his elbow it was at the guard's head. They called it. He wasn't even looking so it wasn't intentional. That's not part of that rule.
Quote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:55:52 PMQuote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.Again guys there needs to be some intent, not only was intent lacking but he made a play for the block meaning its not a flagrant. It was a foul tho, that the refs missed."Flagrant foul. In basketball, a flagrant foul is a personal foul that involves excessive or violent contact that could injure the fouled player. A flagrant foul may be unintentional or purposeful; the latter type is also called an "intentional foul" in the NBA."
Quote from: Snakehead on January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.Again guys there needs to be some intent, not only was intent lacking but he made a play for the block meaning its not a flagrant. It was a foul tho, that the refs missed.
Quote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:52:02 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.Given calls I've seen as flagrants this year, including yes anything to the head basically, it should have been.
Quote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 09:50:42 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?Contact with a man's head while he's in the air? Yeah, I'd call that a flagrant.
Quote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 09:48:57 PMHow is that not a flagrant?Seriously. We are gonna call that a flagrant?
How is that not a flagrant?
Quote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:22:56 PMSoooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?Also no foul on that Hayward play in the 1st game of the year. Maybe the NBA can keep more Celtics players from getting hurt while in the air.
Quote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:25:25 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:22:56 PMSoooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?Also no foul on that Hayward play in the 1st game of the year. Maybe the NBA can keep more Celtics players from getting hurt while in the air.There was no foul on that play because there was no foul. Injuries happen even on legal plays you guys.
Quote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:26:17 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:25:25 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:22:56 PMSoooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?Also no foul on that Hayward play in the 1st game of the year. Maybe the NBA can keep more Celtics players from getting hurt while in the air.There was no foul on that play because there was no foul. Injuries happen even on legal plays you guys.I don't think the head is part of the ball. You should watch it again. It's clearly a blown call.
Quote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:28:55 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:26:17 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:25:25 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:22:56 PMSoooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?Also no foul on that Hayward play in the 1st game of the year. Maybe the NBA can keep more Celtics players from getting hurt while in the air.There was no foul on that play because there was no foul. Injuries happen even on legal plays you guys.I don't think the head is part of the ball. You should watch it again. It's clearly a blown call.I'm guessing he's referring to the Hayward play? Because there was clearly a foul committed against Morris.
Quote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:29:57 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:28:55 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:26:17 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:25:25 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:22:56 PMSoooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?Also no foul on that Hayward play in the 1st game of the year. Maybe the NBA can keep more Celtics players from getting hurt while in the air.There was no foul on that play because there was no foul. Injuries happen even on legal plays you guys.I don't think the head is part of the ball. You should watch it again. It's clearly a blown call.I'm guessing he's referring to the Hayward play? Because there was clearly a foul committed against Morris.Yes I'm referring to the Hayward play. the Morris play was clearly a foul.
Quote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:32:48 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:29:57 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:28:55 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:26:17 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:25:25 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:22:56 PMSoooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?Also no foul on that Hayward play in the 1st game of the year. Maybe the NBA can keep more Celtics players from getting hurt while in the air.There was no foul on that play because there was no foul. Injuries happen even on legal plays you guys.I don't think the head is part of the ball. You should watch it again. It's clearly a blown call.I'm guessing he's referring to the Hayward play? Because there was clearly a foul committed against Morris.Yes I'm referring to the Hayward play. the Morris play was clearly a foul.I think there was also clear contact on that Hayward play.
Quote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:40:55 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:32:48 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:29:57 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:28:55 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:26:17 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:25:25 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:22:56 PMSoooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?Also no foul on that Hayward play in the 1st game of the year. Maybe the NBA can keep more Celtics players from getting hurt while in the air.There was no foul on that play because there was no foul. Injuries happen even on legal plays you guys.I don't think the head is part of the ball. You should watch it again. It's clearly a blown call.I'm guessing he's referring to the Hayward play? Because there was clearly a foul committed against Morris.Yes I'm referring to the Hayward play. the Morris play was clearly a foul.I think there was also clear contact on that Hayward play.Contact does not mean foul.
Quote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:42:24 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:40:55 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:32:48 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:29:57 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:28:55 PMQuote from: keevsnick on January 31, 2018, 10:26:17 PMQuote from: liam on January 31, 2018, 10:25:25 PMQuote from: rocknrollforyoursoul on January 31, 2018, 10:22:56 PMSoooo, how did no foul get called on the play on which Morris was injured? And why wouldn't the ref who was standing right there on the baseline not blow his whistle when Semi was deliberately fouling the nearest Knick to stop the clock?Also no foul on that Hayward play in the 1st game of the year. Maybe the NBA can keep more Celtics players from getting hurt while in the air.There was no foul on that play because there was no foul. Injuries happen even on legal plays you guys.I don't think the head is part of the ball. You should watch it again. It's clearly a blown call.I'm guessing he's referring to the Hayward play? Because there was clearly a foul committed against Morris.Yes I'm referring to the Hayward play. the Morris play was clearly a foul.I think there was also clear contact on that Hayward play.Contact does not mean foul.I think it was a clear foul on that Hayward play...
JB the Unicorn Slayer!