To be fair, Butler signed a contract with the Bulls. He never chose to play in Minnesota. He was traded there and he had no choice in the matter.
That contract was traded, so he should honor it.
eh. I don't buy that argument at all. A player should absolutely be allowed to choose where he wants to play. If he doesn't want to play he shouldn't be forced to. He shouldn't be paid of course if he doesn't play, but he absolutely shouldn't be forced to honor a contract with a team he didn't sign up to play for.
that's crap. that mentality would put an end to any trades between franchises.
He's getting paid very handsomely to play a game for crying out loud. if he hates playing in Minnesota that much, let him quit the league and go flip burgers/work a real job and see how fast he warms up to playing in Minny then.
the truth of the matter is he is an employee of the league with a modicum of choice in where he gets to 'work' when he signs a contract. if he wants to avoid being a trade chip, he can sign shorter contracts or negotiate a no-trade clause in his deal.
no sympathy whatsoever for overpaid crybabies.
this is just silly. you should absolutely get to choose where you work and no one should be forced to work some place they don't want to work. Just imagine that in your own life and your own profession. If he wants to sit out and not get paid, more power to him. Again, he isn't getting paid if he just decides not to show up. If he wants to give up millions of dollars, that should be his right. He never choose to work in Minnesota and he absolutely shouldn't be forced to do so now.
That said, I don't think he just sat out to force a trade. I think he needs to rest his wrist which he had offseason surgery on.
you must be one of those fortunate people who's employers don't change locations. I'm not. I do have the option to find another employer but there needs to be one in a location I like that has a job opening that will compensate me fairly.
no sympathy for Butler. If Minny bothers him that much I'll gladly change jobs and financial compensation with him. I can't dunk but I'll gladly give it my all in Minny
I've actually been transferred by an employer. It sucks, but you have to make the decision that works for you. For me, transferring was the right call, but that was of course the same employer. I knew who I was working for, what it was like, etc. I've never been forced to switch employers or cities through no control of my own, and I would be surprised if anyone in here did as that really is something unique to professional sports. You always have a choice on where to work, except to you if you are a professional athlete. They apparently always have to show up and work even if their whole life is thrown upside down through no fault of their own. That seems pretty communist to me and I prefer a free society.
well, the NBA is his employer technically so he's still working for the same employer. he may not be working in what would translate to 'the same corporate division' that the rest of us would relate to.
does it suck having to be relocated? sure. but wasn't he looking to get out of Chicago?
putting that aside, he's not a child nor stupid. he knows he's playing in a professional sports league and trades are part of the standard business process in every professional league. pouting over being traded or being traded somewhere he doesn't like is unfortunate for him personally but it's part of being an employee of the NBA.
again, if he doesn't like being a trade chip, he can sign shorter deals to make him less appealing or give him the option of moving on to a preferable location after his deal expires at the end of a season or two. it's a grown-up option he has while making more money in a year playing a game that most people won't make in a lifetime of actual hard work-->weighing the benefit of signing a long-term deal for financial security vs the benefit of being able to move to a location of his choice/preventing a trade to a location he doesn't like. Hell, if he wanted both he should have pushed for no-trade deal or a trade-kicker clause that made a trade for him prohibitive.
He is not employed by the NBA, he is employed by the team. The NBA is a governing body which oversees all of the teams, but the teams are the actual employers of the players.
No employer can force any employee to work. The employers recourse would be whatever is in the contract, but generally it just involves not paying the employee, barring the employee from working someone else during the life of the contract, termination of the contract (which would never be used in this sort of case), and not a whole lot else.
Some very communist level opinions in this thread about forcing people to work.
Only as communist as the draft, salary cap, max salaries, trades, restricted free agency, etc. Wait, that stuff is actually kind of communist.
Like you said, Butler has the right to sit out. You had the right to quit your job when you got transferred. We all have these rights. God bless America and the end of slavery.
But if you want to be a part of something, you abide by the rules and structure of it. Jimmy wants to be part of the NBA and get that $190m max contract, but it's the rules and structure that the NBA has put in place that allows for that. Trades, draft rights, etc., this allows teams like Minnesota to field a good NBA team, it's what puts talent in OKC and New Orleans and San Antonio and Utah, etc., it's a big part of what enables the NBA to pay out over $3.6b to players this year. Star players choosing not to honor their contract only so they can play with other teams undermines the whole structure of the league.
I'll echo Donoghus, I always liked Jimmy, but this whole thing is not a good look for him.