That makes it a political issue, its silly to think otherwise.
Since right to life is a pillar of the Republican platform, and freedom of choice is a big part of the Democratic agenda (including it being a litmus test for judicial nominees), I think it's clearly a political issue. That doesn't mean only Republicans believe one way, and Democrats another, but it's political at it's core.
And that being the case, I don't want it mixed with my football.
That's a good point that Fafnir is making about it being an awkward Super Bowl party.
That aside should there also be no ads to try to save Haiti, because Rush said something about it the other day? That must make it a political issue right?
Can nobody try to get us to save the Earth or think green or something because it's too political?
Can nobody buy an ad asking us to be nice to each other and pay it forward or something because that's an Oprah thing and she's political now?
Can Obama not have an ad where he asks us to spend more time with our kids or read to them or something?
No support the troops ads?
You can look at all of these as political or just issues. Politics free I can understand, but an issue free Super Bowl or Oscars I don't think is likely to actually ever happen
To each of your responses:
1. No one argues, not even Pat Robertson, the need for humanitarian relief in Haiti. The matter in which it's handled is a political issue, not the need for relief itself.
2. Green energy commercials are different because thats an actual business. Ant-Abortion messages are not a business, you can build a career of it not a nest egg.
3. Again, being nice to each other is an apolitical concept.
4. Are you kidding me? The Republican spin machine would have a field day with that.
5. Support the Troops? Fine. Support our nation's choice to continue these wars? not so much.