Normally I would respect a player's right to question the appropriateness of continuing the season in the wake of the George Floyd inspired protests, but in Kyrie's case, I am skeptical his position is altruistic rather than expedient (if I can't play, why should you?).
This is the first thing I thought too.
There are no dumb questions. Sounds like quality of life in the bubble questions. Wouldn't frame them as mundane. They should be asking as much as possible.
Yeah, I'm no fan of Kyrie, but this he seems to be specifically targeted here because of his history of being a pseudo-intellectual odd-ball. I think people generally know the logistics of what is going to happen when the league restarts in Orlando, but asking lifestyle questions doesn't seem out of line. Also, his question about whether he counts as a member of the Nets 35 allotted people and what he would be allowed to do is totally legitimate.
I think some people are taking the mundane questions the wrong way. The way I interpret the article, there wasn't a problem with him asking mundane questions like can we order pizza in the bubble. It was that he
only asked mundane questions and had no objections to restarting the league in the small meeting where he voted yes (along with everyone else) to restart the league.
But then in a much larger meeting with many more players present, he suddenly becomes socially conscious and now is trying to get the players to sit out.
In a small group, he had no issues, was only concerned about superficial issues,
and voted yes to restart the league. Later, in front of a much larger audience he acted all high and mighty acted opposed to restarting the league (even though he voted yes to restart it).