Sorry but isn't this WHY we gave up the Nets pick?
In other words, both the Cs and Cavs had to have acknowledged that the hip was an issue and therefore the other parts of the deal had to justify the trade.
I'll be surprised if the deal is refused by the Cavs (the haul is still better than theyll get elsewhere) and I'll be shocked and sick to my stomach if DA parts with an additional assert.
Bottom line is that the Cavs grade becomes a B and the C's get upgraded to a B+ since this becomes a trade that helps the Cs in both the short and long term.
That's my feeling too. There are two possibilities:
1) The Cavs' doctor had a different opinion than the Celtics' doctor on the severity of IT's hip issue upon examining it. Certainly medical records were reviewed in advance of the trade, but if the Cavs doctor, upon examining IT, says "I think he needs surgery with a 6-8 month recovery time", that's a different thing than the Cavs thought they were getting (rehab may cost him the first month of the season).
2) The Cavs are just using the physical, which everyone knew would not show IT at 100%, to hold out for more.
I think it's more the latter than the former, and Ainge should be willing to walk away, no matter the egg on his face. Ultimately I think IT could fit right back in Boston -- it's a contract year and now a team has told the NBA he isn't healthy. The chip on his shoulder would completely outweigh the awkwardness. Crowder might have a little more trouble, but a) he was always going to be a little trouble with all the other 3/4 guys on the roster, b) he can be very easily moved for something useful if that becomes a problem.
Dare Cleveland to take what Phoenix was offering. Bledsoe didn't finish last season, and missed more than half of two of the three years before that. His health can't be that much better than IT, even if he can pass a physical than August.