If it were Mikki on Cleveland in last year's playoffs instead of Joe Smith, we'd probably be amped for this signing.
Color me excited!!!
Well, what if it were Mikki on the Lakers in last year's playoffs instead of Pau Gasol?! Or Mikki on San Antonio instead of Duncan, how amped would we be?!
I think his point was more that the fact that joe smith hit the mid range jumper agaisnt us last year inflated alot of peoples view of him realitive to his actual skill level. I like the guy too, but some of these threads this last week have been overblown.
I would have liked joe smith for the club too, but some of the hype people were throwing around about his skill level was getting a tad annoying. If he was as good as some threads made him out to be, he'd start on 22+ teams in the league.
What people and what threads? I don't recall anyone saying he'd be a starter in many teams. Personally, I said he'd be in the rotation of every NBA team and I'm fairly certain about that.
no one said you were one of the people who were over blowing his talent level. but there were alot of posters, i hope i can say...less post count posters without seeming like a jerk, who have argued in threads like:
http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=25868.0http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=25826.0and
http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=25450.0That a joe smith signing is the key to banner 18, and that he is this transcendent bench god who will suddenly fill our lack of a talented big defender off the bench and score like a 6th man which we also need.
I like joe smith alot as i said, i wish he had been/ gets bought out so we can get him, but to me, he's about PJ browns talent level, probley a bit less defensively and rebounding wise, which some posters have turned into a 6th man.
Joe smith is better than moore, no question, i was just pointing out im not sure the difference is as earth shattering to the title of "back up tall guy" as some people make it seem.